The Great Outdoors Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people who love outdoor activities, excursions, and outdoorsmanship. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have pretty much always worn 100% cotton shirts when hiking but I have been reading more and more about the amazing "wicking" properties of other fabrics.

Is there one that will keep me cooler than 100% cotton when hiking in the desert?

share|improve this question
up vote 14 down vote accepted

Despite the convention, "cotton kills," in the desert those same properties (slow drying, water retention) are useful for keeping you cool by slowing down the near instant evaporation experienced at such high heat and low humidity. Your goal is to make that moisture work as long for you as possible.

Since "water is 24.5 times more conductive than air," (according the an answer found here) water will conduct your body heat away from you more rapidly, making you cooler. Synthetics aid in wicking that heat-sapping moisture away and making it disappear -- which is what you want when trying to stay warm, but NOT what you want when trying to stay cool.

I also soak my shirt in water whenever available, and am always astounded by how fast it dries (even cotton).

So, to summarize: Long sleeve light colored thin fabric cotton is leagues better than any synthetic.

(Originally posted as part of this answer then copied here and expanded.)

share|improve this answer
    
I'm curious also how linen or linen/cotton blends fare compared to 100% cotton. – manoftheson Jan 11 '13 at 3:06
    
@manoftheson About the same in my experience - often the linen is a looser weave allowing for more breatheability but less water retention. There's a reason its popular in tropic areas like India. – Lost Jan 12 '13 at 1:30
    
@LBell Always keeping your clothing wet could cause sunburn, like said here – Wills Jan 26 '14 at 21:20

A lot of the cooling effect of sweat comes from evaporation so it is debatable whether wicking vs non wicking is better in hot dry conditions. Having said that in very hot and low humidity environments it may be a moot point.

One area where it may make a difference is if you are wearing a large pack, in this case sweat can build up under the straps and back and the constant moisture and salt can cause skin abrasion. In this case a fast wicking fabric can be an advantage.

My experience is that polycotton works well in these circumstances as it gives a good balance between comfort, breathability and wicking. Also don't discount wool, very lightweight merino fabrics can work very well in hot conditions as they have both absorbent and wicking properties.

Another aspect to this is that in a desert environment direct sun is at least as much of a problem as ambient temperature so loose fitting very lightweight clothing may be the best option as the insulation provided by a large air space between your clothing and skin is most effective. Note that this is a different situation from cold weather insulation where you want to retain warm air in the space. So in some conditions it may be that a lightweight polycotton smock/shirt is better than a tight fitting wicking T shirt.

share|improve this answer
    
I quite like lightweight merino in the heat, but the problem is its poor abrasion resistance. Under a pack, I find that it simply doesn't last for an economic period. – Tullochgorum Jun 4 at 4:50

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.