Skip to main content
22 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 25, 2019 at 3:50 comment added Loren Pechtel @ShemSeger Followup on my previous comment--more of those berries, including a woman who had picked a whole bagful. This time I knew where to find some unmelted snow--still in the next canyon over, I would guess 10 miles away and involving a class 3 scramble--and that meant going via an approximation of civilization.
Jun 3, 2019 at 2:46 comment added Loren Pechtel @ShemSeger Last year I ran into some berries I was told were good to eat. At that time of year I am not aware of any source of surface water in the whole canyon we were in. The next canyon over has a couple of springs that would have some dampness (but not a meaningful supply of water) at that time of the year.
May 23, 2019 at 5:22 vote accept OddDeer
May 22, 2019 at 17:54 answer added Jan timeline score: 3
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:48 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://outdoors.stackexchange.com/ with https://outdoors.stackexchange.com/
Jul 28, 2016 at 13:13 comment added anaximander @ShemSeger It's also worth noting that just because you can find water, doesn't mean you can drink it safely, whereas you can be pretty confident that certain berries are safe. For example, I know of a place near me where blackberries grow, but the only water is muddy and downstream from the unpleasant end of a field full of cows...
Jul 28, 2016 at 11:49 vote accept OddDeer
May 23, 2019 at 5:22
Jul 28, 2016 at 3:57 history tweeted twitter.com/StackOutdoors/status/758511622172336128
Jul 27, 2016 at 21:12 answer added James T Francis timeline score: 9
Jul 27, 2016 at 20:58 comment added Erik vanDoren Also the question follows the one drinking blood in a survival situation so it seems all connected to that
Jul 27, 2016 at 18:36 history edited StrongBad CC BY-SA 3.0
edited title
Jul 27, 2016 at 18:36 comment added StrongBad @BenCrowell the question is tagged survival. It seems like it might be worth editing it into the titular question.
Jul 27, 2016 at 18:24 comment added user2169 The outdoorlife.com article seems to be talking about a survival situation, but that isn't clearly stated in the question. Is the question about a survival situation, or just a general context? Are we specifically talking about a situation where the person is dehydrated? One danger here is that based on pop culture and urban legends, many people have wildly exaggerated ideas about the danger of being dehydrated. E.g., they believe that "thirst is too late," and that they can be dehydrated even if they're not thirsty. That could lead them not to eat because they imagine they're dehydrated.
Jul 27, 2016 at 17:50 answer added StrongBad timeline score: 22
Jul 27, 2016 at 15:56 comment added Chris H @ShemSeger a dry summer/autumn could easily mean that seasonal springs are dry and berries are ripe. Streams could be few and far between if they're mainly fed by snowmelt and the dried-up springs. I've seen this in Corsica though we were never more than a day's hike from a tap - with an injury things could change fast.
Jul 27, 2016 at 15:24 comment added ShemSeger Where on earth do you expect to find berries, but not water?
Jul 27, 2016 at 14:41 comment added Erik vanDoren @njzk2, In my answer i make the point of saying that "dont eat" is a generalization as the kind of food is something to consider. However I hardly think that in a situation where you dont have any water you would eat a pack of dry biscuits and all in one shot. Your colon will get all it can from it if it needs it (pebble stools). There are plenty of other ways we lose water, feces is the last one to worry about. Plus absorption of water is due to osmosis: sodium, glucose, and aminoacids are needed for that, one salty cracker could help more than no cracker at all
Jul 27, 2016 at 14:27 comment added njzk2 @ErikvanDoren taking the extreme case, you can't gain anything if there is nothing to be gained in the first place. Consider dry biscuits. There will be some water losses.
Jul 27, 2016 at 14:15 comment added Erik vanDoren @njzk2, there are no losses the system is designed to always have a gain, unless there are other conditions causing watery diarrhea which is a different situation
Jul 27, 2016 at 14:02 answer added Erik vanDoren timeline score: 15
Jul 27, 2016 at 13:34 comment added njzk2 I think there are a few valid point in this rule: any water you add for digestion is stuck in your digesting system for a while, which means you deprive other parts of your body of it. Also, you may not have enough water to help the digestion, hence the risk of blockage. Plus, not all the water you add for digestion is reabsorbed, there are losses.
Jul 27, 2016 at 11:23 history asked OddDeer CC BY-SA 3.0