Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 14, 2020 at 9:45 history edited Jason CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 11 characters in body
Sep 14, 2020 at 8:43 comment added breversa @Jason your description of your son’s designation process is a great example of how colorblind people work : they "reason" in terms of shape, distance, position, texture, movement, but NOT color. It took me years to realise that. :-)
Sep 14, 2020 at 7:56 comment added Hermann An article which supports this statement. "The findings lend credence to the theory that people with red-green color blindness make good hunters or soldiers because they are not easily fooled by camouflage."
Sep 14, 2020 at 3:45 comment added Loren Pechtel I will definitely second this--I have something of a red-green weakness (I see the bright colors fine, the subtle ones get me and ones which are too small get me--I usually can't tell if the 1-pixel line is red or green) and I think I was 12 or 13 before I understood the concept of camouflage. Nature programs would talk about the the tiger hiding in the grass when it was as plain as day to me.
Sep 14, 2020 at 2:47 comment added Adam Chalcraft Sounds like two bird spotters - one red/green blind and one not - would be a powerful combination. Since only 5% of the population (10% of men and a negligible number of women) have any form of color-blindness, you should be in demand!
Sep 13, 2020 at 19:08 comment added ruffdove Interesting, I've never noticed an advantage in spotting animals, though as I said, I have always had good distance vision in a family of mostly nearsighted people (my siblings all got my mom's eyes, I got my dad's), so maybe I just assumed this was part of it.
Sep 13, 2020 at 13:02 history edited Jason CC BY-SA 4.0
added 85 characters in body
Sep 13, 2020 at 12:46 review First posts
Sep 14, 2020 at 15:51
Sep 13, 2020 at 12:42 history answered Jason CC BY-SA 4.0