Sometimes when descending with a GriGri, I get the urge to pull hard and zip down the line. Safe reasoning returns and I continue descending with a safe, steady pace. However, I would like to know what sort of dangers exist from descending very quickly, whether using a GriGri or any other descender.

Can the device become hot enough to melt the rope? Not enough time to react to a mis-tied stopper knot? Or is it actually relatively safe, assuming one has taken all the standard precautions?

  • 1
    The heat is distributed over the whole rope, so it seems unlikely to me that it would burn through. A very, very common reason for fatal accidents is rappelling off the ends of the rope. It seems likely that going fast would increase your chances of not noticing that this was going to happen until too late. Even if you are in the habit of tying stopper knots, there may be times when you forget. Another possible problem is getting banged around, which causes you to lose your grip on the brake strand, causing death unless you use a Prusik backup. Maybe more likely if you're going fast.
    – user2169
    Commented Dec 7, 2015 at 19:57
  • @Erik shock loading the anchor seems unlikely when using a dynamic rope, though I could see where it would be higher than a top rope or lead fall since the anchor would be static Commented Dec 7, 2015 at 21:30
  • 2
    Agreed it is more of a problem with a static rope than a dynamic rope. In general though I feel it is a best to trust your anchors but treat them gently whenever possible. :)
    – Erik
    Commented Dec 7, 2015 at 21:34

2 Answers 2


First some general dangers not related to melting:

  • Burning your hands braking on the rope (can also happen with semiautomatic descenders like a grigri due to reflex)

  • Uncontrolled impact on the rock

  • Without a backup knot (e.g. prusik) and with a passive descender (e.g. tuber, eight) you may let go of the rope due to the heat induced pain or when impacting on some unexpected obstacle.

  • Grigris do not have a panic function, meaning when you pull the lever all the way there is no more resistance. This has lead to incidences.

The problem with heat is mostly discussed in caving and canoing communities, as there are commonly huge distances to descend. Still the best source I found was Black Diamond, whose engineers have done some tests on this. They looked at damage to the sling holding the descender device, but the results are still relevant.

Some introductory information:

For argument's sake, Dyneema, Spectra and Dynex are all the same thing. Basically different brand names for UHMWPE (Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene), which has a melting temperature of around 145 °C (293 °F).
Nylon has a melting temperature of around 245 °C (473 °F)
If something is in the neighborhood of 70 °C (158 °F), it's basically too hot to touch
A typical "hot knife" used at climbing shops to cut accessory cord usually tops out at over 650 °C (1202 °F).
Skin burns at 100 °C (212 °F)
An old assumption in climbing is to spit on your belay device. If it sizzles, the assumption goes, then it's hot enough to melt your rope, slings, etc.

In simulated situation with ATCs and 181kg weight they reached a temperature of 256degC, with 114kg and a thin rope (8mm) 170degC. To see whether this is reproducible in a real situation they did a field test. They measured at the bottom of a 150foot (45m) rappel and 10mm rope. When descending at what they describe "kamikaze speed" the 100kg test person reached temperature of 130degC. To test longer distances they used a fishing rod to get the device up again fast. They did six runs with the following temperatures: 111, 110, 131, 120, 125, 135 degC. I do not agree that this means they really peaked at 135degC (i.e. it would not heat any further), but the device could cool off significantly between runs.

Next they tested at what temperatures a belay device actually damages material. On Nylon (polyamid) marks on the fabric are seen at 300degC and it has been cut at 325degC. As heat radiation increases with the 4th power of the temperature and real testing only reached temperatures of 135degC max, I do not expect that you really reach such temperatures. The real danger is that you burn yourself when handling the device after descending.


This is basically a supplemental to imsodin's answer.

In Marine Corps boot camp about 15 years ago I remember one of the instructors demonstrated in dramatic fashion how safe rappelling on the tower was due to the presence of a belayer below. The instructor took a flying leap off the tower and the belayer was able to stop his fall. Given that free fall is about as fast as you're going to fall, the rappel was on a single rope, we used the same rope that the instructor used, and no one died, this is reasonably safe (given a strong anchor).

The problems I see are more related to less than ideal anchors and rope wear. Zipping down the rope is going to produce more friction and wear out your rope faster. Do it enough and fast enough your rope might even get a "glazed" look to it as the nylon fuzz on the sheath has been melted off. Secondly if you come to an abrupt stop on a fast decent you will shock load the anchor. This is especially true if you use static ropes. That shock load isn't friendly to your rope, the anchor, or your body.

Overall, yes I think you can zip down ropes if you want, but please don't do it on my rope. :)

I'm pretty sure we were using carabiner wraps to rappel in boot camp, but it might have been figure 8's.

  • It seems like you're mixing up two different things. Taking a fall with a belayer to catch you is a completely different thing than rappelling, with qualitatively different safety concerns.
    – user2169
    Commented Dec 7, 2015 at 21:10
  • @BenCrowell kind of, but not really. The situation involved belaying someone on rappel. The instructor had his carabiner wrap (or figure 8) setup on rappel and jumped from the tower. The belayer below pulled on the bottom of the rope (without a belay device) and arrested the fall (effectively the same way you would on rappel). ie the belay/rappel device was attached to the falling person's harness not the belayer. The point of the anecdote was the fast decent on a rappel device more than anything.
    – Erik
    Commented Dec 7, 2015 at 21:19
  • I see, he was giving a fireman's belay. But I still don't think this has much to do with the safety concerns involved in the question.
    – user2169
    Commented Dec 8, 2015 at 15:22
  • "I did it once and no one died" is not a good indicator of presence of safety.
    – user5330
    Commented Dec 9, 2015 at 7:44
  • @mattnz clearly that is true and clearly the safety margins are high because failure is catastrophic. My company wasn't the only company to get that demo, and I believe it was a semi standard demo designed to give courage to the fearful while reenforcing the fearless imagine of a Marine/drill instructor. I'm not saying this is a good plan but I don't think zipping down your rope at high speed is as dangerous as slack lining the Lost Arrow Spire gap without a safety line.
    – Erik
    Commented Dec 9, 2015 at 15:19

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.