12

I have read that Rob Hall's body (who died very near the summit in 1996) was discovered. However I have not seen any validation of that. I just watched the movie Everest and I'm curious. Has it been confirmed that his body has been found?

When someone dies on Mount Everest, are there attempts made to recover, or track location of bodies?

17

Above about 7500-8000meters, currently they are left there.

One opinion based answer is because Everest climbers are selfish. Given many people who climb Everest won't abandon a summit attempt to save a life, do you really think they care enough to risk their life to bring a body off the mountain? (Current rates are 4% fatality of all summit attempts, presume body retrieval would be similar.)

A more charitable answer is because above about 8000 meters you are in the death zone. You are slowly dying. You have very limited strength, and no reserves. It is impossible to do much more than put one foot in front of the other. You have very limited reserves (weather, food, water, warmth and blood oxygen level) and "going to plan" can become life threatening if just a couple of minor issues come up. As such, body retrieval, even if possible, is very dangerous, and more than likely, will just create more bodies. Who would risk their life to retrieve a body - would you? Give the presumed answer, the next moral question is is it right for you to ask someone else to retrieve a body and risk their life? Given the problem of the difficulty of moving a body, you could perhaps make it possible by bringing the bodies down in pieces small enough for one man to carry, there are a significant number of cultural and moral barriers to this approach.

Even if you decide morally of all that is is OK, you then need to establish a price. There is a minimum cost of probably 1 million dollars (based on 10 men, Everest summit a costs of $100K each). Is it worth spending 1 Million dollars to retrieve a body? If its not 1 Million dollars, why not - why can you retrieve a body for less than that of when a summit attempt costs over $100K?

Ok, so now we have got past the morals and established the cost, you hire someone, and go up there and they die in the attempt. What are the laws in your country around paying someone to do a job when you knew the job carried very high risk of death?

So the real question should be "Given what happens to a body and the fatality rate, why are so many allowed to climb it?"

Hopefully in time technology will make it practical and safe at a reasonable cost to remove these bodies, till then, its just an accepted fact of the Everest gravy train.

  • 2
    +1 for a practical answer. However: (1) do you have a reference for the 4% fatality/summit attempts stat? It is much lower than I would expect , especially given the avalanche fatalities of several years ago. (2) Given how little the Sherpas are paid, $1,000,000 for body retrieval seems very high. However, your logic is correct, IMO, even if you reduce that cost to $100,000. Actually, your logic is reinforced because you are paying people (Sherpas) very little to risk their lives to retrieve a body. – ab2 ReinstateMonicaNow Feb 29 '16 at 20:30
  • 1
    Cannot find the reference I remembered. Wikipedia gives stats - as of 2010 there were 5,104 recorded ascents by 3142 individuals. Another page states over 250 deaths. That would make 5% of actual summits (what ever it is, it would not materially change the answer. ) – user5330 Feb 29 '16 at 23:40
  • 1
    See alanarnette.com/everest/everest.php. Death rate from 2000 to 2015 is much lower than for 1923 through 1999. Death rate for earlier period (abt 15%) is what I remembered. (Also need to distinguish death rate per summit accomplished from death rate per people who have summited.) – ab2 ReinstateMonicaNow Mar 1 '16 at 1:25
  • 1
    every move you make, if done wrong, could be your last I don't think this is accurate. Everest is nontechnical except for the Hillary Step, and I believe there are fixed lines on the exposed sections. – Ben Crowell Mar 1 '16 at 15:27
10

The answer is yes. But not for everyone.

The first two people on record to die on Everest were George Mallory and Andrew Irvine. There's speculation that they may have even summited the Mountain, making them the first team ever to conquer the tallest mountain in the world, and almost 30 years before Sir Edmund Hillary and Tensing Norgay made their successful summit.

They were last seen only a couple hundred metres form the summit, but never made it back down to the bottom. For decades people wondered if they may have made it to the top, but the only way to confirm that would be to find the camera they took up the mountain with them, and develop the film to see if they had taken a summit picture.

In 1999 an expedition was led to search for their bodies, and against all odds, they were able to find, and positively identify the body of George Mallory, who appeared to have suffered a fall and broken his leg. His body was found almost perfectly preserved (aside from being bleached white by the sun).

enter image description here

Andrew Irvine's body was not found unfortunately, and he was the one who was carrying the camera.

There have been other expeditions to retrieve bodies off of the mountain, there is a foundation in Nepal dedicated to cleaning up Mt. Everest, and to date have retrieved tonnes of garbage off of the mountain, and they collect some bodies as well, but most people request that the bodies of their fallen loved ones be left on the mountain.

enter image description here

For the Most part, extractions are impossible due to the extremes of being at such high elevation, and bodies are left exactly where they fell if they died in the death zone, except for bodies which lay right on the trail, those ones tend to get pushed over the side of the mountain, or they're left on the side of the trail and the 200km/h winter winds will blow them off the edge in the off season, the rest just stay where they are, and will likely remain there, preserved for years to come (just like George). There are over 200 bodies on everest, and that number keeps climbing every year as people line up to go die on the highest summit on Earth.

  • 3
    Sometimes a body will be buried in a nearby crevasse -- a compromise between leaving them where they die and carrying them down. – ab2 ReinstateMonicaNow Mar 1 '16 at 1:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.