I'm after a pair of binoculars for visiting Nature Reserves to get a better view of colonies of birds on the water (at some distance) etc.

Separately I'm interested in aviation and being able to view airplanes that fly overhead (about 15,000-30,000 feet) - not necessarily to absolute detail (registration number etc.) but to be able to see more than I can with the naked eye.

Is there a strength/specification of binoculars I could buy that would be optimal for both of these? Or should I look at 2 separate pairs?

I'm just a "hobbyist" and don't have a lot of money to spend, I'm just looking for a "consumer" spec item.

  • 2
    Airplane watching at 30,000 feet with binoculars? Is that even possible??? Did you mean to write 3,000 feet??? Commented Mar 28, 2016 at 14:05
  • You can buy binoculars with doublers but they are expensive.
    – paparazzo
    Commented Jan 20, 2017 at 0:49
  • 2
    You are not going to be able to hold a scope with a zoom that great steady enough to watch planes without a very nice tripod.
    – ShemSeger
    Commented Jan 20, 2017 at 2:10

6 Answers 6


You can definitely go for one pair.

I've actually been pleasantly surprised at the quality of the optics at almost the bottom end of the market, if you go for something common like 8x20.

We've got 8x, 10x and 12x for wildlife (mainly). None were expensive. The 12x50s are great at dusk but lack the close focus for garden birds or some hides. The 8x20s are a little weak for nature reserves with open water or mud flats.

So I suggest 10x25 to 10x40. Water resistance is a good thing.

When I used binoculars for looking at aircraft on approach (a job years ago) I preferred my 8x to the rather rubbish 10x that were available.

If you find you need more for colonies on water, a scope would be worth it later on. In that case the bottom of the market, especially with a zoom eyepiece, can be poor quality and give a lot of aberrations.


(Ah, I meant this as a comment to Chris' post. Oh well, I guess I need to try making it a real answer.)

For tracking moving objects, a wide field of view (FOV) may also be helpful. (Apparent FOV will be larger than actual FOV, e.g. a pair with a 7° real FOV may have a 52° AFOV: Sport Optics.

If you wear glasses, look for a pair with long eye relief (e.g. 15mm or more) as this will allow you to comfortably use them without removing your glasses. Unfortunately eye relief is usually inversely related to field of view, so you have a trade-off there.

It may seem as though field of view is tied to the size of the objective lens (e.g. the "32" in an "8x32" spec'd pair), but it actually has to do with eyepiece design and magnification. (Bigger binoculars have a wider field of view.) So, you'll want to look at the actual FOV specification to know the FOV. The objective lens diameter does have an impact on how much light is collected, but the quality of lens coatings will also affect this. For a good quality lens, daytime use is unlikely to be helped much by going larger than 32mm.

  • 1
    Why do you say that there aren't significant gains by going larger than 32mm? I always though bigger equals more light and more light is better with optics.
    – Erik
    Commented Jan 20, 2017 at 18:51

Don't concentrate on the magnification (strength) for your first binoculars for airplane viewing, especially if you'll be using them for an additional activity as well (bird watching). Concentrate on getting a binocular with a wide field of view. You'll learn enough from these binoculars to decide which magnification you really want when you buy your next binoculars, which probably won't be fit for both airplanes (far, large, fast) and sitting birds (relatively close, small, and not moving).

If you are interested in astronomy as well, make sure to have a large objective lens. This will allow the binocs to collect as much light as possible in low-light conditions, which is important for making the subject bright enough to see.


(As addition to the other answers)

This also depends on whether you're going to use a tripod or not. If you're not planning to use a tripod, I recommend getting at maximum a 10x magnification, which is about the limit of what you can hold without shaking too much. Then you should consider the field of view as well as the lens diameter. A bigger diameter obviously allows for more light to travel through and therefore gives you a clearer image especially around dusk and dawn. (As a guideline: (diameter in mm) = 5 * (magnification factor) e.g. 10x50 or 7x35). Bigger lenses does mean more weight to carry around.

Also I recommend staying away from the zoom binoculars. In the lower price range they are usually so bad that they break easily and just take away too much light. And again if you are not using a tripod, magnifications above about 10x are quite useless.

  • I'd call the cutoff 12x (assuming you use both hands) rather than 10x but basically agree.
    – Chris H
    Commented Mar 27, 2016 at 21:19

I use a very nice pair of 15x50 image stabilised binoculars for birding/wildlife.

Yes, they're pretty heavy but when I can stand next to a birder with a dedicated spotting scope and see things that he can't, I'm pretty happy with myself.

It's also pretty good for aviation and for casual star-gazing. The image stabilisation doesn't seem to affect image quality in any significant way.

Heavy and expensive though.


I find the Bushnel 10 x 90 0r 20x180 do a fair all round job. For around $60 U.S. 70 or 90 mm. lens. 90 is better for low light. 70 for daytime. These are made in China. The India made ones are junk. Remember the further away the more humidity in the way. Any thing over 20x you need a support to hold steady. But I use these most for setting up photos threw a telescope. For a good clear shot. You should be able to find them on line. Lazada does not ship to the U.S.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.