Can anyone explain the basic process of identifying plants. To assist I also am posting an unidentified plant photo.

Can anyone identify it and explain the method and resources used? Thanks.

Location: Southern Pennsylvania - Gettysburg.

Photos are from August 17th, 2016

These are my personal photos and require no licensing. Feel free to use and share.

photo 1

photo 2

photo 3

4 Answers 4


The previous answers (1,2(now deleted)), unfortunately, exhibit why a simple google search doesn't always work. Two seemingly experienced SE users coming to two different conclusions.

So is this an elderberry or is it pokeweed?

This is where the extra work on the back end (and, honestly, front end) pays off. An initial google image search shouldn't be a stopping point, but it certainly can give us these great search terms to do more research!!

Let's examine pokeweed vs elderberry:

American Pokeweed (Phytolacca americana)

  • Sources of info: USDA, US Forest Service, University site,Wikipedia

  • Key descriptions:

    • Growth Form: Large (up to 10+ feet tall), bushy, herbaceous
    • Leaves*: Alternate, simple, entire, lanceolate, thin, 7-15 inches long, 4-7 inches wide, green on top & lighter below; long petioles
    • Stems: Smooth, red/purplish (or still somewhat green), partially hollow, rigid to flexible / not strong, up to 5cm (~2 inches) diameter.
    • Flowers: white/greenish/pink/purple, 5 sepals, no petals, 10 stamens, grow in long clusters along pinkish racemes; May - October
    • Fruits: long clusters of small (< 0.5 in) purple/black berries, usually many berries per cluster, berries on short stems from raceme
    • Habitat:

    open or edge habitats, especially those where birds are able to roost. It is found at forest edge, in fence rows, under power lines, pastures, old field, forest openings, and other similar areas. It is sometimes a garden or yard weed

    • Range:

    enter image description here

Elderberry (Sambucus spp.)

  • Well, first, we have to narrow this down to some species that might be living in Pennsylvania. Let's try Wikipedia, BONAP, and USDA:

    • S. canadensis, S. nigra, and S. racemosa
  • Narrow our sources: Wikipedia (1,2,3), USDA (1,2,3), University site

  • Key descriptions:

    • Growth Form: Large (up to 10+ or 20+ feet tall, depending on species), treelike, deciduous shrub, woody

    • Leaves*: Opposite, pinnately compound, serrated leaflets 4-12 inches long

    • Stems: Grey bark that might develop furrowing or sometimes soft with pithy center.

    • Flowers: large corymb or panicle (depending on species) of tiny (~5mm) white flowers with 5 petals each.

    • Fruits: drooping clusters of tiny (3-5 mm) purple/black berries; produced in late autumn

    • Habitat: both wet and dry soils, primarily in sunny locations

    • Range:

    enter image description here

Next Step:

Now we know some characteristics to look for, so Let's examine your plant a bit closer:

  • Purple stems (that look somewhat droopy and therefore likely not woody)
  • Thin green leaves that are simple (not compound), alternate (not opposite), and appear to be smooth along their margins (i.e., "entire").
  • Black fruits along short stems coming from long (not drooping/branched) purple raceme

Seems like pokeweed to me.

Let's check alternative related species:

  • According to BONAP, American pokeweed is the only real candidate in Pennsylvania.

Let's do one last quick google search with our (pretty definitive) scientific name ... we'll narrow our search with site:.edu:

What do we find?

enter image description here

Source: University of South Florida

Your plant is definitively American Pokeweed

(Also, based on our researched elderberry descriptions, @David's picture is not an elderberry, but I'll leave it up to you to figure out what it is :p)


  1. Google image search is great, as long as you go into it knowing the right characteristics to look for and which characteristics could be deceptively duplicated in seemingly-similar species

  2. Don't stop at the "close-enough" image. Do your homework. For plants, the best characteristics to narrow/refine species are: Growth Form, Woody vs Herbaceous, Simple vs Compound leaves, Alternate vs Opposite leaves, Leaf Margin characteristics, Flower/Fruit presence/arrangement, Range, Habitat, etc

*See "Plant Identification Terminology: An Illustrated Glossary" (Harris & Harris, 2001) for definitions of plant characteristics


If you're identifying a totally unfamiliar plant in the field, then typically you consult a field guide or botany textbook that has a key.

  • These books can be broad or specific. For instance, I have one that's a pocket guide to conifers, and another that's a guide to Sierra wildflowers. They can also be designed for a technical audience or for laypeople.

As an example, I have a bunch of these growing around my house:

enter image description here

[Source of photo: Agave attenuata, Wikipedia , CC-BY-SA license.]

Without consulting a book, I can pretty quickly tell that it's a flowering plant, and it's what's known as a monocot, meaning plants like grasses and onions that have parallel-veined leaves. I have a book called Plant Classification, by Lyman Benson, and in ch. XI it has a key to the monocots.

  • Item 1 in the key is basically whether it's an aquatic plant (plus a bunch of other criteria). My plant isn't, so I skip down to where the text sends me for plants that don't have this trait.

  • Item 2 is technical stuff about the flowers: "Pistils commonly 10 to numerous, rarely 6-9, separate, each formed from a single carpel; stamens usually 7-many or rarely 6 in pairs, i.e., 2 opposite each petal." This is pretty common for flowering plants -- the classification system is all about the flowers. If the plant isn't in bloom, or you don't have access to a flower, you're often out of luck.

So at this point I go out in my back yard, where I do currently happen to have a plant with one of the big, spectacular flowers stalks like in the WP picture. Unfortunately this one has gone to seed, and all I have left are the dried , hardened sepals. The pistils are gone, dried up and blown away, so I can't apply the criterion in the book.

So at this point I cheat because I know it's an agave, and I look in the index of the book and find that it's part of the lily family, reorganized these days to be part of the Asparagaceae.

So I think you can see from this example that in most cases, if you're a layperson like me, it's going to be very hard to key out a plant from a general, technical book. Your best bet is to find a very specific, localized field guide, like Guide to the Native Cacti of San Diego County, and one that has a key designed to be used by laypeople.

In your situation, your best bet is probably to wait until next year when these plants are in flower (they look like they've fruited in your photos), and take home a leaf and flower sample. It's kind of hard to tell from your photo, but it looks to me like your plant's most distinctive feature is that it has a magenta stem and a magenta raceme with dark black berries. You might be able to google on terms like that and come up with something. As search terms, you could also include the geographical area and stuff about leaf structure (pinnate?).

  • 3
    +1, a "key" is the only right way that's reliable.
    – Beanluc
    Commented Jun 5, 2018 at 18:57
  • 1
    @Beanluc a key is the only reliable way if you know how to use it (and actually can access it)! :p Commented Jun 5, 2018 at 18:59
  • 2
    @Beanluc - Well, not the only way. When Uncle Julian identified a plant on a walk in the woods, I take that as reliable, too. ;) But in seriousness, yes, a key is the way to go. Commented Jun 5, 2018 at 20:42

I think your plant is a pokeweed, Phytolacca americana. I have a lot in my yard in Massachusetts. Our sister site, Gardening and Landscaping has a number of questions about pokeweed. I think this has the best pictures and identification.

To answer your question though, the simplest thing for me is to do an internet search. Choose words that characterize the plant, and see if it comes up. Even if you know only a little, it's possible to stumble on it.

Your case was relatively easy, especially if I'm correct! I don't have a description of the whole plant, but the most prominent features, including the stem and berries, are clear. I Googled "plant with long purple stems and purple berries." The first thing that came up was a list including some websites with descriptions and care information. That's often enough, depending on the plant and how much you want to learn about it. There are closely related plants, though, so you do need to be careful.

  • (Many gardeners choose Wikipedia as their primary information source. It's in many languages, and has a lot of links to other Wikipedia pages. It's not my favorite, though. It's harder to navigate, doesn't always have the best pictures, especially on its home page, and their sources aren't always reliable.)

If you want an easy way to confirm the identification, choose the "images" tab at the top of the search results, or press on the list of images Google search page, and you'll get a page with many pictures of "plant with long purple stems and purple berries." In this case, here" is that page.

  • The plants that most closely match your description generally appear first. As you look farther down, there are more plants with the same general characteristics but don't look quite like your plant. If you want to go farther, click on one of the pictures that most closely matches our pylant. A smaller group of pictures will come up, with links to websites. By using this method, I chose the very first picture and was led to the "Illinois Wildflowers" site, which opened the page clearly identifying it. http://www.illinoiswildflowers.info/weeds/plants/pokeweed.htm. (Again, search engines differ, so just pick one that most closely resembles your plant.)

To make sure the information is most accurate, I recommend choosing a picture that is identified as coming from a gardening or plant identification website. Blogs often change or get deleted. Other sites have good pictures but not much more than that. An example is Pinterest, which is member-based, and ever changing. If you just want to see more pictures of your plant though, that's a fine choice.

A number of Google searches got me to your pokeweed.

Some others:

I also found an app called Garden Answers Plant App which works by taking pictures and comparing them to a database they claim includes over 20,000 plants. This one is made by Apple, so it only works on Apple products, but I think there are others for different operating systems. You might want to look those up. I haven't used them so I can't vouch for them.

  • @David. That's interesting. You posted your answer while I was still writing mine, so I didn't know it was there. I felt sure the plant in question is a pokeweed, however, now that you've identified it differently, I changed my answer to reflect "thinking" rather than "knowing"! Commented Aug 21, 2016 at 20:04
  • 2
    I'm pretty sure you're right, and it's a pokeberry, not an elder as David thought. If you do the google search David suggested, it leads you to this page herbalrootszine.com/articles/elderberry-vs-pokeberry , which is about telling the two species apart. Based on the shape of the fruit clusters, I think the OP's plant is clearly not an elder.
    – user2169
    Commented Aug 21, 2016 at 22:44
  • 1
    Actually, I think it is poke weed to. If you go to the page that the image comes from, it talks about differentiating between poke weed and elderberry. I didn't go too far into detail, however, because I was trying to describe the method rather than the results :) Your answer has a better final result, and better details than mine, so I am glad you didn't see mine and stop writing.
    – David
    Commented Aug 22, 2016 at 3:15
  • 2
    Google is ok, but only if you're somewhat experienced. It is sooo easy to look up an unknown species (especially plants, insects, & fish) based on a characteristic and end up at the completely wrong answer because of similarities between closely-related (& sometimes even distantly-related) organisms. If you do choose to use google, you need to always seek corroboration from multiple reputable sites (e.g., .edu, .gov, etc.) while simultaneously checking range maps and searches for related species (yes, you'll have to delve into scientific names). Quick answers are often wrong answers. Commented Jun 5, 2018 at 17:43
  • 1
    @theforestecologist, thanks so much for your help. I appreciate the edit, and think I'll take out some more extraneous text. More importantly, thanks for the education. I read your profile, and am fascinated! I know Biology is your specialty, but I hope you'll choose to be more active here. We're expanding into areas where your expertise would be appreciated. (By the way, I greatly dislike Wikipedia, but have been criticized at Gardening for not using it, because it has many languages.) Thanks again! Commented Jun 11, 2018 at 23:52

The free Android app inaturalist is pretty legit for plant and animal identification using pictures. It pointed me to the #1 option being American Pokeweed using your 3 pictures, the location, and date. https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/48599-Phytolacca-americana?locale=en

  • Also you can checkout Plantnet... plantnet.org
    – nr_aus
    Commented Nov 9, 2020 at 6:51

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.