19

Authorities have recently banned climbing in my favorite site "for safety reasons". This is, in my opinion, unfair, and was done for unknown political reasons.

What can I do to hopefully change their minds so that climbers can continue to access the site?

Also, what proactive/ preemptive things can I do as a climber so that this doesn't happen in other climbing areas?

  • 1
    Is this state property you're talking about? I'd like to know more about whether it's state or federal, whether it's park land, national forest, etc. – Don Branson Nov 30 '16 at 16:13
  • 1
    It's not US, so I don't have a legal definition like that. Anyway, it's not private land. – anatolyg Nov 30 '16 at 16:37
  • 5
    Knowing your country would help. There are many country or region specific climbing groups that may be able to help provide direct support or advice to you. The British Mountaineering Council for GB is one example. Rambling, walking and other out door interest associations can also aid with campaigning for access up to the climbing site. – TafT Nov 30 '16 at 17:18
16

Access to climbing areas is an ongoing issue in many climbing areas. In the United States for example, it is claimed that 1 in 5 climbing areas is threatened by an access issue. There are many funds, societies, and advocacy groups who work on behalf of climbers to protect public access to climbing areas, to keep them open to the public for recreational climbing. Try searching for an access group that works in your area.

The issue of access is not always so simple, as there can be multiple factors to consider when it comes to certain crags. Around where I'm from, there's pretty much open access to everything, because most of the climbing areas are on crown land. There are however a lot of cliffs and boulders that are on private land, and private land owners have the right to prohibit trespassing on their property.

The biggest concern with climbing on private property in some countries is liability. In North America for example, If someone gets hurt climbing a private crag, then the landowner is legally liable, and can be sued. Most land owners prefer to restrict access to their lands instead of risking the possibility of even one lawsuit. Local authorities are especially likely to restrict climbing on municipally owned lands, because they are regularly subject to a plethora of ridiculous claims (people frequently sue towns and cities because they can't be bothered to be accountable for tripping over their own feet on the sidewalks, and hurting themselves). In the USA this is especially common because in many cases suing is the only option an injured person has for paying their hospital bills.

One sensitive issue with a lot of climbing areas is the presence of native art on the rocks. I know of several areas nearby that are prime climbing areas, but climbing there is somewhat controversial because it can do damage to the ancient art on the stone. Access to areas where native art is present is often restricted, and it just so happens that in most places where native art is preserved on stone, the rock is prime for climbing.

If climbing has been banned at your crag "for safety reasons" then it sounds like a local authority issue, in which case your best chance of restoring access is to partner with a access group, and petition the local authority. If you can show the authority that an area can be responsibly climbed, then they may work with you to open access to climbing. Talk to the CAO or City Manager about presenting to your council, that should always be your first course of action when seeking change in a policy in a municipality.

As far as preventing access issues, what you need to do is demonstrate that the area is being used responsibly. Leave No Trace ethics will ensure that no flags are raised about improper use of an area. I've seen crags full of garbage and covered with graffiti.


There's a now-popular climbing area close to where I live that used to be closed to climbing. The Town of Frank in Alberta used to prohibit people from climbing on the millions of boulders which were the result of the worlds largest rock avalanche, that buried most of the Town early in the 20th century. I remember when signs used to be posted on the side of the road telling you that climbing on the rocks was prohibited. Today it's a renowned bouldering area with thousands of established problems, with more new problems being established almost weekly. Access was granted after it became clear to the municipality that bouldering was a huge tourist attraction, and promoting the area attracts a lot of tourism and benefits local businesses.

Frank Slide (Gripped Magazine) enter image description here

  • 11
    Oh look, pebble wrestlers. – Charlie Brumbaugh Nov 30 '16 at 4:14
  • 7
    @CharlieBrumbaugh Do you want to start a fight? Because that's how you start a fight :P – ShemSeger Nov 30 '16 at 6:05
  • "Easement by custom and practice." – Joshua Nov 30 '16 at 20:06
  • 3
    Good answer except for the line If someone gets hurt climbing a private crag, then the landowner is legally liable. This must be dependent on country or jurisdiction - I'm confident it is not necessarily true for the UK for example. A better way of putting it might be 'the landowner might be legally liable, or might worry about the risk of legal action'. – nekomatic Dec 1 '16 at 9:39
9

As an individual, probably very little can be done, but what little you can do is essential. Ensure yourself and anyone you climb with obeys rules and climbs safely, and most importantly, is seen to do so. Be considerate to other users of the area as very often the "Safety" card is played but the root cause of bans is often other reasons. I have experienced situations where a few climbers with a sense of entitlement have meant crags that would have been open with a "Please" and "Thank you" have remained closed for years. It may not be fair, but just one person breaking the rules or obeying the rules but being a A.Hole can be enough to close a crag with access problems.

As a part of the climbing community, you have more power - where you can ensure other climbers follow the above advice and separate 'climbers' from 'cowboys' in the publics eye will help. If 'climbers' are seen as safe and socially responsible, but not all people who climb are 'climbers', then doors can be opened.

In most cases I have seen climbs reopened, its been though the actions of a recognised organised club, usually of national significance or associated and supported by a national or international organisation. Best thing you can do is join a local club with strong ties to a national level club. None of this happens quickly, often years before significant progress is made. Its possible for such groups to be able to negotiate access to otherwise closed crags as they can show climbers will have training and belong to a organisation that has rules (and insurance cover)

Where I have seen sites put into jeopardy have been concerns that allowing climbing exposes the land owner/manager/responsible person to legal consequences if things go wrong. In this case, legal advise clearly showing who is responsible and who is not may help. If the land owner/manager is legally accountable for an accident, you need to consider their position, and accept that maybe the problem cannot be solved. In this case, it will come down to the ability of a strong national organisation to have laws clarified or changed - slow and expensive.

9

I think that it is easier to keep access, than to get it back, so I will start with that.

  • Always follow Leave No Trace and make certain that your activities do not create any eyesores.
  • Volunteer to help pickup after other people and clean up the trash they leave.
  • Protect the reputation of the climbing community, always be safe and do not hesitate to speak up if you see someone else acting in an unsafe manner.
  • Join or donate to the Access Fund as they are one of the leading organizations in this area.

As far as getting access restored,

  • The Access Fund has a page to report these kind of issues, and they may be able to help.
  • It may be worth getting a petition started or attempting to get a more in depth answer from the authorities.

Losing access is not a good thing, but at the very least I would spread the news so that more people are aware of the issue. Then it might serve as a wake up call for unsafe/disrespectful people.

  • 1
    The Access Fund link seems to be specific to North America (perhaps even only USA?). I think you should mention that in your answer, as it determines who will find this answer useful. BTW, what's LNT? Is it a North American equivalent of the Access Code, or something different? May be worth expanding the abbreviation if it's not widely known. – Toby Speight Nov 30 '16 at 14:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.