# How to triangulate your position with a map and compass?

While navigating or orienteering with a map or compass one of the essential skills is the ability to find your position on the map with the aid of the compass.

This can be important if you need to know your exact position.

How should one do this?

The basic idea behind triangulation is take multiple bearings with the compass to recognizable points and draw them on the map.

Where they intersect is your location.

You want the lines to be as close to perpendicular as possible, for the sake of accuracy. The reason is that when the lines are perpendicular, a change in the angle isn't as significant.

See how the angle between the red and the green lines in Example B is much smaller than the one in Example A, and yet the difference between where the red line intersects the black line and where the green line intersects the black line is much greater.

Beyond using multiple points, there are other ways to do this. For instance if you are on a long natural feature like a trail or stream or ridge, you can take one bearing to a feature off to the side.

You can also take a bearing parallel to a feature like a curving river and that will give you a good idea of where you could be as the other places along that feature wouldn't be parallel.

One a rounded hill, if you have an altimeter, you can take a bearing directly up or down the hill and find where that bearing runs perpendicular to the contour lines and crosses your current elevation.

Off the three other examples above, the one off to the side is the most accurate, the parallel one depends on the situation and only really give a possible location and the last depends on the accuracy of your altimeter.

• Your first figure uses a point C that you don't then mention -- presumably as a check. Perhaps this should be included in the text. How about some comments on the accuracy of the various methods? My feeling is that in real conditions the last two aren't very accurate, though they might be good enough (The last time I did much triangulation was Dartmoor letterboxing, where you tend to know where you are to within a few hundred metres but want precision, possibly including close features that don't make it onto the map) Jan 30, 2017 at 16:19
• @ChrisH I made some comments about the accuracy, Point C isn't always necessary, it there more to keep of the pendatic people who would say that using only 2 points is biangulation and triangulation requires 3. Jan 30, 2017 at 16:26
• Technically speaking, this is known as resection not triangulation. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Position_resection Feb 3, 2017 at 21:06
• @MartinF I knew someone was going to make a comment like yours :) The reason I am labeling it triangulation and not resection is that rightly or wrongly it is commonly called triangulation and so that is what people are going to be searching for :) Feb 3, 2017 at 21:32