5

Whistles can be used to signal to group members, however the downside is that other people may think you are having an emergency.

Are there any other devices that would allow you to signal with noise to other members of you team but would not cause other hikers to assume that you are in trouble?

5

I'm sure this isn't what you were shooting for but using radios, satellite phones, cell phones, etc. would all count because they transmit the "noise" of your voice to your target where it is reproduced as noise. So in a way it is kind of like teleporting your words/noise exactly where you want it to go or speaking in a targeted echo chamber. :)

The advantages of using something like a radio/phone instead of a whistle are plentiful and pretty obvious. Just to increase the length of my answer I'll name a few:

  • You can communicate just with your party
  • You can communicate more complicated things easier than using a whistle
  • You can communicate with people farther away than could hear your whistle
  • etc.

There are two primary disadvantages to radios/phones.

  1. The terrain might prevent the signal from reaching your target.
  2. They require batteries, and must be turned on to work.
  • 2
    The terrain issue can be significant. I was relying on radios during work in the woods once and our team didn't meet as expected. The "FOOO" sound from my answer actually worked better than a pea-less whistle and the non-functional (due to terrain) radio I had, according to my team which eventually got back together. – cr0 Mar 23 '17 at 20:39
5

Percussion

Drums have been used historically to communicate over long distances in forested areas, so you could send messages simply by knocking on wood. Pick up a couple of hard sticks, and knock them against each other or something else that has some good acoustics. You could communicate with morse code this way, and the average traveler would just assume they're listening to a woodpecker.

If you're looking for something to carry, you could bring a pair of claves along with each group:

enter image description here

They make a strong sharp sound that will carry quite a ways, and double as a pair of fighting sticks incase you need to go sinawali on something.

4

I spent a summer with two brothers from the Dominican Republic and they would call out to each other with a loud howl-like "FOOOOOOOOOOOO" sound that carried very well through fields, forests, and over a lake.

Later in life I spent some time with a friend of a friend who was essentially squatting and setting up a semi-permanent settlement in the jungle. Him and his gang of goons used the same sound, a howl-like "FOOOOOO" to signal their presence to each other in a remote Latin American 'city' on a hillside, and they said they used it in the jungle too. I was surprised to actually hear this and see it work for them to regroup from different parts of the city - it really carries well!

The folks from the latter story told me it's the sound that humans can make the loudest for the longest amount of time (key thing there is it's not only loud and carries well, it can also be drawn out for a long period). When you get the chance, try it out, and notice how long you can make it with relative ease (it doesn't take your breath away as other similarly-loud calls might).

I put it to practice and found it works. Myself and two others were relying on radios during work in the woods once and our team didn't meet as expected. The "FOOO" sound actually worked better than a pea-less whistle and the non-functional (due to terrain) radio I had, according to my team which heard me and eventually got back together.

Cup your hands by your mouth like a megaphone and howl out to the sky, "FOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!"


As for getting in trouble, generally the signal for emergency is three repeated calls. So, don't do that. If you just call once or twice and wait a reasonably long time before calling again, people who are listening are more likely to say "Oh, they're OK or they'd be SOS'ing or calling out more chaotically in a panic." The FOO sound specifically carries very well but doesn't have the sense of urgency that a high-pitched scream or whistle does, at least in my experience.

  • Growing up we would hoot to each other when separated in the woods. We would use an "H" sound instead of your "F" sound. It always worked well for us too. – Erik Mar 23 '17 at 21:09
  • "Hoooootie hooooooo!!" – cr0 Mar 24 '17 at 14:28
1

One alternative is to use animal calls. For instance, on a clear night an elk bugle call can be heard up to a mile away. There are also duck calls or push-to-call cow elk calls.

These should not replace a whistle as an emergency signaling device, but as a way to hear where your team members are or signal back and forth without shouting they do work.

One of the downsides of this is that in some places the use of animal calls is illegal, for instance in national parks in the United States. The other is that you may attract animals (this is what the calls are designed for), including predators and extra care should be taken during hunting seasons.

  • 1
    I briefly added an up vote to this answer, having flash backs of western moves and such. Then the vision went a bit farther and I realized that amount of expertise and pre-planning that would need to be shared by the members to allow for clear communication, without risk of misunderstanding from local animal, would require so much work it is unrealistic to expect these experts would require artificial calls. These experts would use their hands, voices, grass, and other natural materiel's to create the sound. – James Jenkins Mar 23 '17 at 16:35
  • @JamesJenkins Because its so much work no artificial calls would be needed? I am not quite understanding your comment. – Charlie Brumbaugh Mar 23 '17 at 19:27
  • 1
    @JamesJenkins I've been out hunting ducks before and we could tell where the other hunters were based on listening to them call out for the ducks. We've also had to wave off hunters that were coming to us thinking our calls were real. i up voted Charlie's answer because even though I don't see this as a common strategy I've seen it work in real life. Plus you can usually muff your call in characteristic ways if you are worried about being confused for a real animal. Calling is a skill so a muffed or bad call is noticeably different than a real animal. – Erik Mar 23 '17 at 21:18
  • 1
    @CharlieBrumbaugh manufactured duck calls are an aid for those unskilled in calling see Old-Time Ways Mouth-Calling Ducks if you are going to communicate meaningfully, both parties need to sufficient experience and knowledge that a manufactured call is not needed. Otherwise you have Erik's example of people mistaking animal and human communications leading to confusion. P.S. I am not the down voter, nor do I have calling skills but have known people who have the skills. – James Jenkins Mar 24 '17 at 10:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.