I don't think of myself as being a paranoid individual, but I am cautious about people I meet when hiking. For example, if I am eating lunch at a site less than a mile from an infrequently used trail head and someone shows up with inappropriate gear (for example no pack and wearing jeans) and attempts to start off a conversation by asking me where I am headed and how long I have been out, I get cautious and might even pack up early. I understand that it is likely this person is just being friendly while out on a day hike that does not require appropriate gear, but I have no idea how often this person is in fact up to no good. Similiarly, on the Appalachian Trail if I get to a shelter near the road that I was planning on camping at and it looks like someone is living there, I might decide to keep hiking. This may be completely irrational since I cannot recall ever hearing of anyone being assaulted or robbed on a hiking trail or at a campsite.

To keep the question somewhat focused, how often are crimes like robbery and assault (I am not concerned with all crimes like vagarency, public intoxication, or drug use/possession), committed/reported on the Appalachian Trail?

  • 2
    You are not paranoid. As for "never hearing of anyone being assaulted..." see Fredericksburg.com, double murder. A friend of mine had a narrow escape many years ago. The guy was creepy and came on to her, she ran, he chased her, but she runs very fast and caught up with other hikers. Maybe you are more cautious than some, but that is far from paranoid.
    – ab2
    Commented Feb 9, 2018 at 4:18
  • @ab2 and now I have heard of this murder on the AT in VA of a hiker by another hiker: cnn.com/2019/05/12/us/appalachian-trail-machete-attack/…
    – StrongBad
    Commented May 13, 2019 at 18:56
  • And in my state (VA) too. I'm trying to tell myself that it was in Deliverance-like-territory, but that doesn't make me feel better. My recent answer to a related Q by Charlie B now seems too flip.
    – ab2
    Commented May 13, 2019 at 19:07

1 Answer 1


Note: I don't know that its possible to answer this without mentioning the things that have happened, some of which were pretty horrible. Not everyone may want to read this.

TLDR: People will be a horrible out of civilization as in it, and the rarity is matched by the severity and barbarity of the incidents.

For theft;

"We do have some crime. One of our volunteer caretakers was robbed at gunpoint a month ago at a trail shelter near Eckville, Pennsylvania," Proudman said. "The individual was captured in Wyoming."

Most of the 200-300 incidents reported a year are petty crimes, Proudman said, including vandalism, and backpacks getting stolen.


Sadly, one of the biggest dangers along the trail is that posed by other people. While most hikers you come across will likely be friendly, some might be aggressive or try to steal your pack when you’re not looking. Theft is especially prevalent at small towns along the trail. Never leave your bag lying outside of a restaurant, store, or hostel along the way.


Trouble is uncommon on the Appalachian Trail, but theft is not uncommon. Cars parked at trailheads may be targeted for break-ins, because thieves know that the owner will be away for a while.


There is also a study done that simply asked if hikers had experiences that made them feel unsafe while hiking the trail and while not all of those involved people (such as unsafe conditions) a number of them did.

Amongst the 467 solo thru-hikers (thru-hikers who hiked less than 25% of the trail with a dedicated partner), 233 (50%) reported having an unsafe experience. There was no difference between men and women in reporting an unsafe experience.


Proportionately, more solo women than solo men reported their most unsafe experience as being a strange person on the trail, strange person in town, hitchhiking, and other.


Putting sex aside and looking at the general difference between solo hikers and partners, the odds of a solo hiker having an unsafe experience was 1.3 times more than that of a hiker in a partnership, so this implies that hiking with a partner has a slight overall protective effect, regardless of sex.


In fact, 50% of solo thru-hikers reported having no unsafe experiences at all.

A significant limitation of this survey was that it only asked whether or not hikers had an unsafe experience (i.e., yes or no). For those who did report an unsafe experience, the survey did not ask “how many?” So the case may be that even though women and men both reported having at least one unsafe experience at rates that did not differ, women could have still experienced more unsafe events than men, or vice-versa.


For murders and rapes,

Since 1974, about ten murders took place on or near the Appalachian Trail.


Nine of those are listed here.

This Washington Post article from 2008 says,

There is about one assault a year and one rape every three years, on average, according to Conservancy figures. There have been eight murders linked to the trail since the 1970s, King says.** The most recent was in January, when Meredith Emerson, 24, was abducted on Blood Mountain in Georgia and killed by Gary Michael Hilton, a 61-year-old drifter.


Beyond that, there is little but news stories but not any studies that I could find.

The 19-year-old from New York paused in her Appalachian Trail hike to mail herself a package that she could pick up after she'd hiked farther north.

A Vinton man saw her walking along U.S. 11 toward the Troutville Post Office and offered her a ride in his sedan.

But he took her instead to the office of the Botetourt County trucking company where he worked, and he sexually assaulted her.


Gettysburg police said a 46-year-old Alabama hiker received second- and third-degree burns in a Thursday morning assault by people who may have thought he was homeless.


Police said two men got out of the car, threw liquid on the victim and lit him on fire.


Randall Lee Smith (1954 – May 10, 2008)5 was a convicted murderer from Pearisburg, Virginia.7 He pleaded guilty to two counts of second-degree murder in the deaths of Robert Mountford Jr. and Laura Susan Ramsay, who were killed while hiking the Appalachian Trail, in May 1981.


On May 6, 2008, Smith attempted to kill two fishermen less than two miles from the site of the 1981 murders.


Williams, 24, of St. Cloud, Minn., and Winans, 26, of Unity, Maine, were found about a week after they set out on a camping trip in May 1996. Their bodies were discovered about a quarter-mile from Skyline Drive off the Appalachian Trail in Shenandoah National Park, south of Luray. Their hands were bound, their mouths gagged and their throats slit.

Rice, 35, has been charged with two counts of capital murder for the killings and faces two additional counts of capital murder on the grounds that he intentionally selected Williams and Winans because they were female and because they were gay. He has pleaded not guilty to the slayings. He is currently serving an 11-year sentence for assaulting a female bicyclist at Shenandoah National Park in 1997.


Five of its hikers had been killed in four attacks, the earliest in May 1974, the most recent in May 1988.

Those crimes shared traits with what transpired at Thelma Marks. Two of the four attacks were aimed at couples. Three came at trailside shelters. All were ghastly.

Still, none drew the attention, or generated the angst, of the incident here. Perhaps it was because Thelma Marks fell within range of news media in New York, Philadelphia, Baltimore, and Washington, D.C., and because it involved not only a crime but a mountain manhunt that lasted a week. Perhaps the shelter’s remoteness—far greater than that of past trouble—played into our big-city uneasiness about what lurks in the woods at night.

Maybe it was the sheer savagery of the act. Or the questions that lingered when the man responsible would not say why he shot Geoff three times or why he tied Molly’s hands behind her back and looped the rope around her neck. Why he raped her. Why he stabbed her eight times in the neck, throat, and back.


Meredith Emerson used her wits and martial arts training when she was attacked in the north Georgia mountains by a drifter who eventually killed and decapitated her, the convicted killer told investigators.

Gary Michael Hilton described his four days with Emerson, and how she fought him from the moment he tried to overpower her as she hiked with her dog, Ella, according to the interviews that The Atlanta Journal-Constitution obtained from the Georgia Bureau of Investigation.


People are far more dangerous than any wild animal, for comparison Yosemite, which has much better recorded statistics, the wild animals have been responsible for 6 deaths with half of those from Hantavirus carried by rodents compared to 44 homicides and 70 suicides Source page 575.

In summary, theft/assault/rape/murder is rare on the Appalachian trail, at the same time incredibly horrific crimes have been committed against hikers.

This doesn't mean that one should stay home (we are all going to die regardless) or to avoid people altogether but it does mean that one does need to be vigilant, and you can't assume that anyone has your best interests in heart.

  • 4
    While it clearly took some work to compile this data (+1), it is unfortunately not very meaningful without a control. The absolute number of crimes on the AT is by itself meaningless. To be meaningful, it would need to be compared to the same number of people being out in public in other areas and circumstances. For example, how does the chance of being robbed on the AT compare to the chance of being robbed while walking on the street in New York, some back street of Newark NJ, etc, for the same number of exposure hours? Commented Feb 8, 2018 at 12:33
  • @Olin Lathrop I once attempted to make this comparison, but got diverted by other tasks. I haven't been In NYC for a long time, but when I did go there regularly, I was very alert and kept a good hold on my handbag. Whenever I go on Metro (DC area), I likewise am alert, and don't wear expensive jewelery. As for walking the backstreets of Newark, not a chance! The OP did not ask for quantitative comparative risks, but only if caution was warranted. Part of the problem calculating comparative risks is that the data is hard to come by, and has very large error bars.
    – ab2
    Commented Feb 9, 2018 at 4:31
  • @ab2 See my latest question outdoors.stackexchange.com/questions/18453/… Commented Feb 9, 2018 at 4:33
  • Just saw this news posted today: msn.com/en-us/news/crime/…
    – Loduwijk
    Commented May 13, 2019 at 19:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.