What can we do to bring water loss from breathing down to the absolute minimum possible?

Techniques or devices useful to adventurers with no frequent water access is what I am looking for, such as hiking or biking across a desert for longer than is reasonable to carry or find sufficient water.

Water does not necessarily need to be reclaimed by drinking. Any answer for which water that would be otherwise lost due to breathing but is in your body keeping you healthy instead is a good answer.

See also: "Is drinking urine safe?" (Short answer: No) Urine is another one of the biggest sources of bodily water loss, and you can distill it back into pure water with a small amount of resources and a sufficient heat source.

Food for thought: I recall that in the story "Dune" the people on that desert planet had access to wearable water reclamation equipment which reclaimed almost all of their water, not only from breathing but other sources as well. Dune is science-fiction, but it does make me wonder if such technology is actually available in reality; is there any easily portable equipment that can reclaim a significant portion of breath water in the same way?

This question is inspired from reading this answer to a question about water rationing and death from dehydration. From that question, and reading up on the topic elsewhere, it appears a reasonable portion of water lost per day can be due to water vapor lost in your breath. This can even be a significant portion of water loss in some environments, such as cold dry air.

  • 1
    Related: How to stay hydrated with minimum water usage
    – ShemSeger
    Jul 3, 2018 at 21:54
  • I could envisage a solar-powered Peltier-cooled mask or even helmet that condenses the exhaled water either to humidify incoming air or to drink. But I've never heard of such a thing in real life and it would be heavy and bulky
    – Chris H
    Jul 4, 2018 at 5:50
  • @paparazzo No, I just remember reading it somewhere (possibly on outdoors.SE I don't remember). I'm not sure how well it works, but I was just throwing it out there as the only real-world example I could think of. I think the idea behind the scarf is that, in cold environments, it creates not only a thermal layer but also a "humidity layer" that keeps the air next to your mouth moister compared to the dry air surrounding you. I can say from experience that putting a scarf on increases condensation within it and on my glasses, but I made no claims about actual water retention effectiveness.
    – Loduwijk
    Jul 5, 2018 at 16:23
  • @ShemSeger I had read that answer before but forgot about the relevant section within it. Thank you. If we get a full and well written answer on my question here, hopefully that information in your other answer is worked into it.
    – Loduwijk
    Jul 5, 2018 at 16:45
  • Wear a stillsuit. Aug 4, 2018 at 11:21

4 Answers 4


In cold weather a simple thick scarf over face and nose is effective and reducing exhaled water by between a quarter and a half. On inhaling, the scarf is chilled. On exhaling, some of your breath moisture condenses. On your next inhale some of the wet scarf moistens and warms the incoming air.

Generally the scarf ends up a frozen mass from the water vapour frozen. Acrylic scarves are easier to beat the ice out of and dry.

In passing, in cold weather, about 1/4 of your energy is used to evaporate water to keep your lungs from turning into dust. (ok, hyperbole...) This calc based on effectively 0 absolute humidity in -10C air, and 100% humidity in your lungs.

The energy use is going to be similar in a hot desert, but in this case it is acting in your favour. You need to get rid of surplus heat. If you don't lose it from your lungs, you have to sweat instead. Water lost by dripping off your face onto the ground isn't going to cool you.

Ask instead, how you can reduce the heat you pick up from the environment.

  • 1
    Interesting. So you are suggesting that, at least in some scenarios, I should not want to reduce the water loss? I think that your estimation of sweating is more hyperbole; at least, the general teaching is that you sweat then the evaporation of sweat lowers your temp (since, as you yourself noted about lungs, evaporation is a valid refrigeration technology)... still, your point that losing it from the lungs might be more efficient is one I had not considered. Even so, I wonder if there is still a good way to reclaim that moisture. Good info and good food for thought. +1
    – Loduwijk
    Aug 1, 2018 at 15:12
  • As for the last sentence, reducing heat, that is something I have thought a lot about. When I have a large surplus of water I solve that problem by dumping water over myself frequently which works great, but that is the opposite situation as being discussed. Hmm... I think I see your point with that, you mean reducing temperature to reduce the need to use water to lower temperature? That is another excellent point.
    – Loduwijk
    Aug 1, 2018 at 15:15
  • 1
    Hot desert climate: Stay out of the sun. Wear several layers of light coloured very loose light clothing. Wear a hat. Travel at night. Aug 3, 2018 at 2:23
  • Yes, I agree and would do similar. Usually, if I'm in the heat I also have access to lots of water and can just keep well hydrated and keep my clothes wet, as I've never done an extended, non-car-camping kind of outing in a very hot/dry location... but I would like to hence the question. But yes, I am considering a question along the lines of what you suggest, but I don't want it to be simply "how to keep cool when it's very hot," so I have not asked it yet. If I do, I'll link the two questions.
    – Loduwijk
    Aug 3, 2018 at 17:16
  • Sweat that evaporates off of you takes heat with it. Sweat that drips off of you is wasted. In high temp, high humidity situations, you lose by drips as well as evap. Oct 26, 2021 at 19:16

I had a quick look at this from another angle in 2021. I found an existing breadth condensate collection device. Not the ideal answer in and of itself, but certainly worth a look.

They place an upper bound for collection from an adult of 250 microlitres a minute, that's if you can actively cool the collection tube. The device collects up to 10 minutes worth but I figured you could modify the design, take two, collect from one while using the other.

But I think it works out at 15ml an hour, so only 150ml over 10 hours. Maybe you could improve the design a bit, but I think you need more or less another order of magnitude.


So with the disclaimer that this answer is not based on experience with any actual field-proven practices or tech, and posted in the hopes of contributing to idea generation by people who like to invent and test new gear:

Breath is saturated (100% humidity) and the moisture content of air at different temps varies (see https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/maximum-moisture-content-air-d_1403.html ) so there is reason to believe one could reduce moisture loss from the body (and thus reduce necessary water consumption) by either humidifying the air inhaled, or recapturing the air exhaled.

One method might be to figure out a way by which the moisture you breathe out migrates into the air you breathe in. I think this happens when breathing through a scarf in cold weather: the exhaled moisture condenses on the cold fibers of the scarf, and this condensate moistens the incoming air. One might conceivably optimize this via some membrane that wicks moisture from your exhaled breath into the path of inhaled air while preventing you from rebreathing the bulk of the exhaled carbon dioxide.

Another might be to use that moisture to dampen the skin—reducing sweat if not actually making it possible to reabsorb, although this would likely be undesirable in cold weather.

A third would be to trap it (condense it or absorb into some hydrophilic material) and release it later. If you assume available science-fiction energy source, this last method could work—you could capture all vapor with a tiny refrigerator coil, kill bacteria with ultraviolet or remove it with reverse osmosis, and eliminate volatile compounds (stank) with a carbon filter. The question is are their circumstances in which it’s practical: Cool desert-morning air flowing past a heat exchanger on a bike frame might be one.

This article on nih.gov pubmed indicates water loss ranges widely due to exertion and weather, from 7 to 70ml/hr. So your setup needs to be pretty light and/or your trip pretty long before it’s better than just carrying additional water. But the “heat exchanger” could literally be a crumpled beercan or length of thinwalled aluminum tube so I don’t think it’s out of the question.

Note also that the water loss calculation is based on moisture out minus moisture in, so humidifying the air you breathe in really would help.

I think humidifying breath for cold weather activity is the killer app for this. Stumbled on this 1957 report on arctic face masks for US military here. This suggests other design criteria for this device.

  • 2
    Speculative answers without research or experience get downvotes Jul 4, 2018 at 2:36
  • 1
    @mmcc thank you for your contribution, and please try not to let the downvotes get to you since they are indicative only of what is expected for an outdoors.SE answer and should not be taken to mean that your answer is not useful. I agree with Charlie that this answer technically does not fit well with how outdoors.SE expects answers to be; however, just because it is not a good fit for the site does not mean that it doesn't provide some good direction and food for thought. Note that I did not down-vote the answer since I found it useful and inspiring.
    – Loduwijk
    Jul 5, 2018 at 16:32
  • Thanks Aaron—(and Charlie too for the feedback)—downvote system is elegant in that the answers move down but do not disappear, in other words out of the way of majority users while remaining available to potential niche interest. Similarly the SE reputation system seems well thought out in that 5X difference between upvote and downvote impact seems to reward answers that have utility to any substantial minority.
    – mmcc
    Jul 5, 2018 at 20:27
  • I gave it an upvote as it increases understanding of the situation. Aug 1, 2018 at 0:28
  • @mmcc Your comments have been edited into your answer. You might want to rethink the first paragraph in response to that, especially if you have anything else to add. And hopefully you do; these suggestions are along the lines of what I was looking for, even if they are theoretical as far as outdoor recreation goes.
    – Loduwijk
    Aug 6, 2018 at 15:18

Prevention is better than cure!

There is simple strategy that the other answers seem to have overlooked.

Research shows that you can reduce water-loss by exhalation simply by breathing through your nose rather than through your mouth.

According to this paper, the savings are in the region of 40%.

Nasal breathing will also help prevent over-exertion, which will reduce water loss through sweating.

It's a win all-round.

So the first resort is the equipment we've been gifted by nature - our nose is free, portable and relatively fail-safe!

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.