Edit: Thank you for all the helpful replies. I will have to go through them all now, and I will pick the best fitting one for my question.

I will go backpacking in the summer of this year, for about 2 weeks. With me I will take a DSLR (Pentax K3) and two batteries (fully charged), as well as my phone (on airplane mode, as my GPS device) and a powerbank (I have not chosen which to buy yet). I will also take a paper map with me.

Considering I will use my phone as a GPS while hiking, and I will turn the DSLR on only when taking pictures, what size/capacity of powerbank would you recommend for a period of 2 weeks?

  • 2
    Yes, exactly. Sorry, I am still learning to be precise in asking questions on here.
    – seesta
    Jun 19, 2019 at 9:37
  • 1
    Not a problem! +1
    – Aravona
    Jun 19, 2019 at 10:03
  • 2
    Leaving the camera on will definitely consume more energy.
    – user15958
    Jun 19, 2019 at 11:10
  • 3
    What is the context? Are you following marked and well-used, easy to follow trails?
    – Gabriel
    Jun 19, 2019 at 13:24
  • 2
    @JollyJoker I edited it and the title. Hopefully this makes it more understable. But I already got a bunch of great replies.
    – seesta
    Jun 20, 2019 at 10:14

9 Answers 9


I did use my phone as a mapping device a few times when I forgot my dedicated GNSS receiver at home (for peakbagging day-trips where I need to reach a specific point often under forest canopy and without easily identifiable landmarks). The battery doesn't drain exceedingly fast but the more I look at the screen and interact with it, the faster it drains. It can last one maybe two full days, highly variable depending on the use.

I have an Anker PowerCore battery, which has a capacity of 27 Ah. It charges my phone around 6 times. This would barely cut it for 2 weeks, and it's the absolute largest power bank I'd carry while backpacking, at 500g.

My important recommendation:

Your plan is teetering on the verge of impractical, so I would highly urge you to consider leaving your phone off most of the time and using paper maps until you really need to check your position. It's highly dependent on the destination of your trip though. Open taiga with no trails or forested and marked trails are wildly different contexts.

  • 22
    Agreed. Paper maps and compass are enough for properly marked trails, leaving the GPS off until absolutely needed. The other way around, if the route is hard to navigate by map, then trusting solely on a (comparably fragile) phone with unknown battery usage sounds risky. Especially considering it's the same device used to call for help in an emergency.
    – Dynat
    Jun 19, 2019 at 13:56
  • 2
    I use my phone for navigation. Use airplane mode, only turn on the screen when necessary and turn off the phone over night and it can last several days.
    – Michael
    Jun 20, 2019 at 6:32
  • 1
    What is "open taiga"? Taiga means forest, and usually a very dense forest at that. Do you mean tundra?
    – gerrit
    Jun 20, 2019 at 11:04
  • 1
    @gerrit this is open taïga. It's the transitional zone where the boreal forest gives way to tundra but where it's definitely not tundra yet.
    – Gabriel
    Jun 20, 2019 at 12:57
  • 3
    A dedicated GPS navigation device is another option. They are designed for low power consumption and can have a long battery life. They are fairly expensive though, especially compared to a paper map, but is probably less time consuming to use. Jun 20, 2019 at 13:28

Consider buying a power bank with a solar charging panel; that lets you recover from an accident like leaving your phone on overnight with something consuming power.

There are two main types on the market:

  1. Big panels you unfold and hang up at your campsite or on the back of your pack while walking. (I've never used these.)

  2. Standard batteries with a small charging panel set into the side of your case; you can carry it in a mesh outer pocket or some models have a cutout you can clip a carabiner through. The technology on these is getting better but isn't quite mature. Expect a slow trickle charge and efficiency that starts to degrade after a year or two.

I've had four batteries with built-in solar panels. They were perhaps an ounce heavier than standard batteries of their generation, and about $5-10 more expensive than regular ones. (One degraded solar capability over time, one was recycled when the battery cell inside started to swell, and I have a pair in current use (no pun intended.)) They aren't great, but they do give me peace of mind as part of my earthquake kit.

Also consider a crank charged battery -- I don't have direct experience with those, but it's another way to acquire electric power on the trail.

Also consider taking your cost and weight budget and splitting it in half, and getting two smaller batteries, to eliminate a single point of failure.

It hopefully goes without saying that you must also carry good paper maps in case your phone breaks or gets wet; many phones don't handle high temperatures well, either. There is a big difference between not being able to get that perfect photo and not being able to find the trail (or the right trail from several choices) after detouring around an obstacle.

  • 5
    From my calculations the solar panels weigh more than the needed batteries unless you start needing more than 20,000 to 30,000 mAh and they are more expensize Jun 19, 2019 at 18:38
  • I don't have experience with the standalone panels, but the small solar panels built into the case have added minimal size and weight compared to other batteries of their generation.
    – arp
    Jun 19, 2019 at 19:13
  • 3
    Even if solar panels weigh a bit more, they will allow you to recover from some event that drains your batteries (accidentially leaving the camera turned on and connected over night). Jun 19, 2019 at 22:56
  • 5
    Honestly, all small solar panels that are practical to bring while hiking are so anemic that you burn through power way faster than they can charge in real conditions. And I've tried more than a few.
    – Gabriel
    Jun 20, 2019 at 2:15
  • It takes very little power to call 911.
    – arp
    Jun 20, 2019 at 2:18

How much margin due to charging inefficiency should I add when calculating the size of batteries needed for a trip?

You need approximately 50% more due to inefficiencies while charging from a power bank.

How much energy you really need will depend a lot on the actual usage, so you'll have to make some experiments. Put your fully charged phone in airplane mode and use it as you would on your trip (navigation or whatever) and measure how much time the battery lasts until it gets to 90%. Multiply this by 10 to get the maximum battery life. Some phones also calculate this themselves and show "battery time remaining" somewhere in the settings.

Then look for the design capacity of your phone's battery to see how much energy (expressed in mAh) you need for this time and extrapolate for two weeks. Just to be sure I'd add a considerable overhead (perhaps another +50% or even more, depending on how bad a power outage would be).

A major contribution to energy consumption will be the screen, depending on the brightness, so that would be a good first place to look for possible savings.

  • Can you provide a way of applying this technique to calculating the capacity of my DSLR as well? Can I follow a similar way of calculating it?
    – seesta
    Jun 19, 2019 at 10:10
  • 8
    The bars on a camera battery meter are fairly imprecise, more so if the battery is old.
    – Chris H
    Jun 19, 2019 at 10:49
  • 3
    I think this answer issues the proper frame challenge. The proper question is not "how much power do I need," but "how do I determine how much power I need." The actual amount, of course, depends on how you use the devices, but the process for measuring is pretty universal.
    – Cort Ammon
    Jun 19, 2019 at 19:10
  • 3
    Neither my phone nor my camera has an accurate battery meter. The phone shows full charge until shortly before it shuts itself down for lack of power, while the camera starts at 75% charge, quickly drops to 0%, then keeps working for another few hundred shots. If you want to accurately measure battery life, you need to run the device from full charge until shutoff.
    – Mark
    Jun 19, 2019 at 20:10
  • 2
    That sounds like a severely damaged battery, from my experience, the "forecasts" are quite good
    – Jasper
    Jun 19, 2019 at 20:36

It all depends on how (and how much) you use those devices.

Personally, I can say more about DSLRs than phones, and with 2 different DSLRs on 5 tours (of 2-3 weeks) there was never an identical usage so far. The "official" number of photos you can take with one battery can be exceeded by limiting every usage outside of taking the photos - those are included in the estimations. Videos and liveview are extremely draining (continuous image processing) and should be avoided if possible. Turning off the display for longer use, and taking an excessively large SD card help too (you won't waste battery deleting bad pics).

Also, with more planning and using the analog viewfinder before turning on the camera, you might save battery time while planning a shot and might skip it alltogether if it's not working out. I've noticed the amount of shots I take decreased with every tour, as I knew some shots (if taken) would get deleted anyway, which in turn reduced the number of batteries.

Always leaving the camera on would be detrimental - that might be useful for phones that need to start up a metric ton of programs each time, but cameras are rather simple in that regard. My cameras have default power saving modes that turn off the camera when not used for a minute, indicating that the manufacturer has done that math. Leaving them on for 8+ hours per day seems excessive, but you can just try that at home if you want.

Last but not least, as Jasper's answer explains, charging inefficiency wastes additional battery power. If you think your DSLR batteries are not enough, you should rather add DSLR batteries instead of carrying additional charger devices and powerbanks. Even the cheap chinese ones give you a better mileage per weight. Charging everything from the same source might be more flexible and convenient, but wastes battery (by charging inefficiency) and weight (by additional devices).

  • 4
    +1 mainly for the last paragraph but it's all good. Further DSLR tips: turn screen backlight down to minimum and shade the screen if you have to review. Look into screen timeout settings as well as power-off timers.
    – Chris H
    Jun 19, 2019 at 10:39

It depends on how many pictures you want to take and how much weight you want to carry. In your case it looks like two camera batteries is enough for 1600 pictures, that may or may not be enough for your purposes.

As far as your phone goes keeping it only in airplane mode, using the the low power setting and only turning it on when needed means that usage will be as minimal as possible. If you are going to use it as a GPS then the longer you can go without looking at it or using it for tracking the less battery you will use.

If you start getting low you can prioritize the phone over the camera.

As far as what sizes, I would suggest a 20,000 mAh power bank to start with, and then go to a 10,000 mAh size if that's too heavy and you don't need the extra size.

Personally I carried a 20,000 mAh power bank to charge cellphone, GPS and camera for trips lasting up to almost two weeks and that was a larger charger than I needed.


A couple of points that I think haven't been addressed:

  • Charging efficiency is greatest when you are charging between around 20/30% and 80%. So try to not let it get below 20% and try to stop when it's at about 80%. This will help you charge more from the same charger. You probably can't do this with the camera batteries, but you can with the phone battery if you're able to charge during the day. Also, don't leave it plugged in; only plug it in to charge and then unplug, or it may discharge some while plugged in (called 'maintenance charge') even once full.
  • Battery performance is much worse in cold weather. So if you're going hiking somewhere quite cold, below 10°C, expect much more difficulty keeping your phone charged than in moderate weather. Try to not use it during the night, and try to charge during the warmer daytime.
  • Hot weather can be a problem also. If it's going to be over 30°C much of the day, expect that to mean both your phone might run out of charge faster, and that the charger might not work as well. Try to charge at night time in hotter weather.

Overall you should definitely test what the discharge rate of your phone is - I wouldn't test 100%->90%, but 60%->50% or so; if you're able to keep it in the 30%-80% range that will be more representative of your performance. I would expect that if you're cautious about what you use you should be able to be okay with around 25000 mAh of battery or so. But this depends in part on the phone; an iPhone XS Max will take a LOT more battery than a much smaller iPhone 5c, for example.


Although this has been mentioned in some comments, it needs to be stressed more strongly:

Do not rely exclusively on electronics for navigation, in particular not on a smartphone!

You must always bring a paper map¹. You must always know where you are on that map. I recommend to hang a good map case around your neck, so you can monitor your progress on the map continuously.

For me, a dedicated GNSS receiver serves several purposes, none of which are essential:

  1. Route ideas — get tracks from wikiloc as inspiration on where to go. This is particularly useful in areas where topographic maps are poor, such as in the United States, Canada, or Spain. In principle you can use this functionality without any GNSS receiver, by printing the track on a suitable background (national topographic map if available, opentopomap otherwise).
  2. Track logs — upload your tracks to wikiloc or combine them with your photos to find out where you are. A smartphone will not work for this purpose due to battery life, except perhaps for day hikes. A good GNSS receiver with good batteries can last for weeks on two AA batteries.
  3. Saving time — if you are hiking on a trail that is on openstreetmap, or following a track or route from wikiloc, you may realise more quickly than otherwise if you have taken a wrong turn. But since you should always know where you are on the map, you should normally realise your trail isn't doing what you're expecting it to do anyway.

  4. (really 3b): If you really do get lost, it could save you a lot of time, to the degree that it could in some scenarios save your life. My friend has a GPS receiver for this purpose alone. He has never used it.

A camera is of course a non-essential item, it's up to you how much you are willing to carry. I've found that bringing one extra battery is enough for a mirrorless camera for 2 weeks.

So, to conserve power?

  • Switch off your smartphone. You do not need a smartphone in the wilderness. By switching off your smartphone, you will conserve its battery in case you need it (although I can't think of any scenario in which you will, unless you're hiking in a densely populated area with mobile phone coverage and are therefore not bringing a satellite phone or PLB or similar).
  • Obviously, only switch on your camera when taking a photo, and switch it off again afterward.
  • Use battery save mode in your GNSS receiver, or expedition mode if available.

¹Some people insist on navigating terrain without a map. You can do that if you are sure you know exactly what you are doing, but it takes a lot of confidence and experience, in particular in areas that are unfamiliar, unfrequented, unsignposted.

  • Why the downvote?
    – gerrit
    Jun 22, 2019 at 8:00

Considering I will always have my phone turned on while hiking

There's a lot of variability in this, even given that you've specified airplane mode. Why is it on?

  • Track logging with the screen off? This won't use much power, but you could still get through a charge in a couple of days on many phones. If you lose your track logging you're still safe.
  • Navigation with the screen on? This can eat battery especially if the sun is out (the backlight is a significant power drain). If this is your primary navigation, are you safe if your power lets you down (or, for that matter, if you break your phone).

(Navigation with only needing to look at the screen occasionally is somewhere between these two - if your app behaves with the screen off)

  • Comms when you do get a signal? (i.e. take it out of airplane mode at the top of a hill to check in). You can turn it off for much of the hike, turning it on only as you climb.

Turning it right off overnight will save you battery, but not if you're using it for an alarm clock.

With the DSLR, the number of shots you take makes a big difference, but biggest of all is if you use the flash. On a trekking trip you shouldn't really need it; even in low light propping the camera on something solid and avoiding the flash is likely to give nicer results much of the time.

  • 1
    I will mainly stay on a track and only rarely strive off of it, to go explore or set up my tent close to it. So, my goal is to not look at it too often. However, the idea to use minimum brightness occurred to me as well.
    – seesta
    Jun 19, 2019 at 12:03
  • 1
    Could possibly a dedicated GPS device be more suitable, as a phone has a lot of background applications you just can't turn off even in airplane mode?
    – Aravona
    Jun 19, 2019 at 12:15
  • 6
    @seesta I don't recommend relying on a phone as a primary navigation source for extended periods of time. At least tell me you memorized the general route and have good paper maps with you. If you could not navigate the trip without your phone, you're doing something terribly wrong.
    – Gabriel
    Jun 19, 2019 at 13:05
  • 2
    @GabrielC. phone as primary is fine, so long as your backup is robust and you know how to use it. For me that means a backup on paper - a map at an appropriate scale and often route notes, with a compass unless you can rely on signposts to get your bearings
    – Chris H
    Jun 19, 2019 at 13:09
  • 3
    @ChrisH The Garmin Etrex 20x is on sale for 160 Euros on Amazon right now, and this is a rock solid fully featured option for mapping. I wouldn't call this quite expensive.
    – Gabriel
    Jun 19, 2019 at 14:03

I run into similar problems on canoe trips.

  • My camera is a through-the-lens viewfinder, not an electric screen. Doing an entire canoe trip (3 weeks) and taking ~500 frames is easy. In addition, for the Nikon you can get a cute carrier that allows you to use 3 CR123 lithium batteries instead of the rechargeable one. A set of the disposable lithium are equivalent to roughly 2 of the rechargeable ones. I have the screen set to the shortest period available for review.

  • I carry an InReach satellite communicator. I turn it on for a few minutes in the morning when I get up, and again a few minutes at night. I exchange a few messages with home to show I'm all right.

  • I have a Magellan PN-60 GPS. This has an LCD screen, not a touch screen. I turn it on in the morning and off at night, and have it set to go to sleep when stationary. I can usually get 2-3 days of usage from a single pair of AA batteries. By default I have WAAS switched off, and backlight for the screen set to off or the minimum value.

  • I carry a set of paper maps, and a good compass too.

  • I have a small 3000 mAhr battery that can recharge the InReach device.

Some general observations:

  • Phones generally don't have good GPSs. 50 meter errors are routine.
  • My iPhone will drain the battery in about 3-4 hours if I'm using an app with GPS. This, even if I'm only checking the screen for a few seconds every half our or so.
  • Due to the way topo maps were generated, there is frequently a 50 to 100m horizontal error in the placement of contour lines. The error is usually N/S and is due to parallax errors from the point of view of the aerial camera. The errors are locally systematic. e.g. Within a region of about a km they will all be shifted the same way by the same amount. This usually affects E/W running contours on a steepish slope. I have found situations where the GPS location plotted me at the base of a 50 meter hill, while the topo map showed that location as the top of that same slope. DO NOT DEPEND ON PRECISE LOCATION.

Topo maps are not all inclusive. They are the Cole's Notes version of the landscape. On canoe trips I have found deadly rapids (Class VI) that were unmarked. I have found missing islands, and ones that were on the map twice.

The versions that are created to fit on a GPS/phone are even more summarized.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.