12

Tents with (the outer tent) made of cotton or "technical cotton" (cotton blends) are heavier, more expensive, and take some more time to dry but they also have benefits (see below). Sure the weight is an argument against for backpacking but in other travel scenarios the benefits are more relevant.

Nevertheless my impression is a decline in selection of cotton tents. What's the reason for cotton tents not being more popular? Several people I spoke with mentioned a fear that cotton tends to leak but experiences of people that actually use cotton tents tell the contrary, so may it just be bad marketing?

P.S.: Asserted benefits of (poly-)cotton tents include

  • better climate because the material breathes
  • better sound insulator, less noise in wind and rain
  • better resistance to UV light and heat, resulting in
  • likely easier to repair
| improve this question | |
  • 5
    Can you provide sources for "more durable"? And what would be "etc." for the benefits? – Jasper Jun 20 '19 at 17:03
  • 4
    Cotton tents do leak – when you touch the inside. You don't usually touch the inside of the flysheet (outer tent) but it is possible if a careless person presses the inner tent out towards it. – Weather Vane Jun 20 '19 at 17:30
  • 4
    I remember cotton tents from my childhood. There is no way I would use one ever for anything except perhaps the long-term fixed base camp concept. – Jon Custer Jun 20 '19 at 22:09
  • 3
    @JonCuster I find them fine for large tents that you have up for a substantial period, like a scouts camp, they were perfect for that. I remember we went sometimes inside on hot days - my small modern tent, I don't want to be inside when the sun hits it... – Frank Hopkins Jun 21 '19 at 2:21
  • 3
    @FrankHopkins - true, but I also remember how they smelled, particularly after they got wet... – Jon Custer Jun 21 '19 at 3:00
25

I grew up car-camping in a frame tent (slept 4 in about 1/4 of the floor area). Those things are heavy. Seriously heavy. Lifting the fabric onto the central pole with that half-extended was hard work for someone strong. The poles had to be pretty robust too, as the pitching process involved one or two poles taking most of the weight at various times. The whole thing took well over an hour to put up.

Some of the downsides of such designs could be solved with more modern constructions, but trying to lift that canvas by pushing on dome tent poles would get nowhere and/or snap the poles.

The bulk and weight made storage difficult. The fabric and pole set each weighed more than an entire similar sized nylon flexible-pole tent. At least here in the UK tents are often stored in lofts (attics) and getting a frame tent up a ladder was hard work if it even fitted through the hatch.

Even packing a car was harder due to the bulk. And they're too heavy for roof boxes.

If you did ever get home with a wet tent, that's a lot of fabric to get dry - and you have to get it dry thoroughly and quickly to avoid mould.

For scouts use, the needs are different. You need robust and large, but they're normally stored somewhere easily accessible, and you have a team of people to erect them (the ones I used were put up rather like raising a barn, in that several people pulled one end up, rather than ever having to lift the fabric high.

| improve this answer | |
  • 7
    Scouts also tend to make use of the fact that a cotton tent is much better compatible with a fire inside. – cbeleites unhappy with SX Jun 20 '19 at 20:03
  • 7
    @cbeleites in my scouting days we never had a fire in a tent. We did cook under open-sided canvas dining shelters and it wasn't unkown to get flames on top of a frying pan! But if you pitch around a fire pit some tents will always be downwind and embers will land on them, which would make holes in synthetic materials (at least) – Chris H Jun 21 '19 at 7:55
  • 2
    Are the newer scout tents easier to keep up? My uncle regaled me with tales of the tents falling over constantly and pictures seem to show a LOT of pegs... – user3067860 Jun 21 '19 at 18:48
  • 1
    @user3067860 I last used them in the 90s. Yes, a lot of pegs but rock solid once properly up. The only time they ever came down was when half finished – Chris H Jun 22 '19 at 8:39
  • 2
    @ChrisH: of course. Inside fire needs to be quite small even with big tents (here's an example image I found: https:/www.jurtenland.de/files/u1/indischejurte.jpg . That kind of tent is for something between 15 and 25 people). And also, even if the tent is cotton and quite forgiving in terms of embers, sleeping bags usually are not. That's why I tried to somewhat qualify my comment with "tend". – cbeleites unhappy with SX Jun 22 '19 at 18:21
12

A good cotton tent is expensive, but can be very good value as they last a lifetime and are childproof. In The Netherlands, families may camp up to 5–8 weeks per year, car camping on campgrounds in western or southern Europe. They quite often have cotton tents, I'd say they are the majority of quality family tents on those campgrounds, such as in the pictures below.

During my childhood, we always went camping in summer, for up to six weeks in a row, using a bungalow tent, with the kids sleeping in a cotton tent somewhat similar to the pictures below (only a somewhat cheaper model). Only in adulthood when I started backpacking, did I first learn about the problem of condensation — there is no such thing in a cotton tent. Synthetic tents are really only needed if you carry a tent on the back or the bike.

Consider a stereotypical image of a French campground in summer:

kamperen
Source: Camping le clou

Or at the coast:

kamperen 2
Source: NOS

All the tents you see in these images are cotton.

Cotton is a more durable material, it is stronger and thus more weatherproof, it breathes naturally, it doesn't look soggy when wet.

(Incidentally, in my family we call the type of erecting the tent seen in the second image — with the opening away from everybody else — De Waard style, after the brand of tent pictures; a rather introvert way of camping!)

There are advantages of a synthetic tent:

  • Much lighter and packs more compactly — essential for backpacking or when flying to holiday destination, highly desirable for bikepacking or taking the train to holiday destination.
  • It's cheaper — when only camping for 2 weeks per year, families might not want to spend €3000 for a tent. In The Netherlands it is quite common for families to camp for 8 weeks per year. Spend 8 weeks per year camping for a tent that lasts 20 years, and a €3000 tent is less than €3/night — not bad when it sleeps 6 and is large enough to stand upright (at least for children) and play monopoly on rainy days.

From your question, I deduce that in some parts of the world, such tents are not popular even among families car camping. I would speculate that such families are either in caravans, campers, or "glamping", or perhaps not willing to spend the money for a cotton tent. The market probably relies on families having long holidays. Which is consistent with the other answers referring to scouts: scouts do spend 8 weeks per year plus in their tents (I think), which makes the expense worth it. Families who can only go for 2 weeks per year (USA?), not so much.

| improve this answer | |
  • Also, scout tents tend to be owned by one (or several) groups together, so many people each camping for a few weeks and the same gear being used by group after group over more than a decade even if people "grow out" of camping age can still lead to the gear being far more heavily used than what synthetic tents can stand. Also, the scout tents are made of several tarps so the weight can nicely be shared by 4+ people (4 tarps make a tent for 8 - 10 people). You can also use these tarps for 1 or 2 person setups, but then that's heavy compared to, say, a construction tarp of roughly equal size. – cbeleites unhappy with SX Jun 22 '19 at 18:25
  • People grow out of camping?! :-O – gerrit Jun 22 '19 at 18:35
  • What I see is that also the style of camping changes. Scout groups are usually kids/teens. Their "home" groups often dissolve at some time (e.g. when school is finished and people go to different places to learn a profession or study). As students we went camping in smaller groups, sometimes as big as 6 people, but often also single or 2 - 3 people. At some point I got myself a VW-Bus and since, I may also sleep in there (so do other friends). Not sure whether that's camping, though. At each "transition", some people somehow stopped camping. I've never been involved in the 2 months... – cbeleites unhappy with SX Jun 22 '19 at 18:48
  • ... on campground type of camping you describe, though. People here do this as well (though out summer holidays are shorter), but I've been involved in more "nomadic" varieties, never been at the same camp for more than a few days at most, and not in too large groups (also never been to one of the big scout meetings). I guess that's a different crowd from what you describe. – cbeleites unhappy with SX Jun 22 '19 at 18:52
8

I think your question spells out pretty well why people prefer other materials (cost,weight) and they really aren't used for backpacking where weight matters.

The times I have ever seen them in use it was an outfitters camp where the tents are setup for an extended period of time and they had had mules/horses to pack the tent in. The other use case is car camping where the weight is less of an issue.

Beyond that there really isn't a use case for them.

| improve this answer | |
  • Oh nice, I did not know about mule camping! The scouts also use cotton tents for large groups, so why isn't cotton the norm at family campgrounds where people come by car? – Jakob Jun 20 '19 at 16:05
  • 1
    @Jakob because you spend mostly the night in it, so you don't care that much about climate. You are not that many people as a scouts team mostly, so the drawback of heavy lifting weights strong and you want to travel light, so you buy light, i.e. less space in your trunk taken away and quicker build up times. – Frank Hopkins Jun 21 '19 at 2:24
  • @jakob why isn't cotton the norm at family campgrounds where people come by car — where in the world are you located? It is certainly the norm here in Europe. – gerrit Jun 21 '19 at 8:29
  • @gerrit Can you edit Charlie's answer to add that cotton tents are actually quite popular among car campers in Europa? I think this would fully answer my question in brief to I can mark the question as resolved. – Jakob Jun 21 '19 at 8:34
  • @Jakob I've added my own answer instead. I believe Charlie's answer is specific to the USA or Canada. – gerrit Jun 21 '19 at 8:46
3

Biggest reason is weight.

Horse packers still use canvas wall tents. Almost indestructible if you don't store them wet. But a 9x12 wall tent can weigh over a hundred pounds, and much more if wet. These same packers have the weight allowance to pack cast iron cookware and sheet metal stoves with chimneys. This class of tent is usually packed in to a base camp, set up, and left up for the entire season. Packers bring clients in, and do day trips either for nature stuff or hunting from that camp.

Breathability:

Mostly nylon tents now have a breathable tent, and a waterproof fly.

Much of the breathability of cotton comes from little attempt to make the closures tight. Bug resistance is not a term I associate with cotton tents.

The theory of cotton is that it breaths until it gets wet. When the cotton fibers swell, they close the openings in the fabric and keep (most of the ) water out. In practice every cotton tent I've seen either was waterproofed with some combination of wax, turpentine and zinc stearate, or it leaked.

Silk tents

During the Klondike gold rush, the better mushers used silk tents. VERY light weight compared to cotton. (Silk is very strong) This saved significant time during limited daylight in setting and breaking camp, as well as making for a lighter load.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.