Aside from risk of fire (which for this question we will assume has been fully mitigated) what is the real risk of suffocation if one were to use a stove, lantern, or candle lantern in a tent?

There have been some reports of death from this (whether it be from CO2 or CO), but others have used such products in their tents without issue.

  • What is the relative CO and CO2 output of various products?
  • How much air circulation does one need to keep it "ventilated" enough?
  • I will be curious to know what is the average amount of Co2 produced by a stove vs the average amount of co2 generated by human breathing. My guess would be that stove will win but I heard of people suffocate in closed cars while sleeping.
    – Amine
    Dec 5, 2012 at 17:51
  • I can not say about tents, but suffocation is a major concern when building an ice cave for winter camping. (The typical solution is to build an air vent with an ice axe.) Dec 5, 2012 at 18:40

3 Answers 3


I'll answer a question in the comments:

I will be curious to know what is the average amount of Co2 produced by a stove vs the average amount of co2 generated by human breathing. My guess would be that stove will win but I heard of people suffocate in closed cars while sleeping

To make things simple, lets assume assume your body burns 2,600 calories (~11 MJ) per day, and burns purely glucose.

At 3.75 calories (9.83 kJ) per gram, you'll be burning around 690 grams of glucose per day, or a little under 24 oz (710 mL) per day.

40% of that glucose is carbon, so the 9.60 oz (280 mL) per day of carbon in glucose yields about 35 oz (1 L) of CO2 per day, a little over 2 pounds (0.9 kg). About 1.5 oz (44 mL) of CO2 per hour.

This value is close enough to what wikipedia has, so we can assume 1.5 oz (44 mL) of CO2 per hour to be correct.

A typical canister stove has an 80/20 mix of isobutane and propane. If we look at the 8.3 oz (250 mL) MSR ISOPRO canister with a superfly stove, that will give us a burn time of about 60 minutes.

That 8.3 oz (250 mL) MSR stove is mostly carbon by mass, with 6.8 oz (200 mL) of carbon, which when burned will produce about 25 oz (740 mL) of CO2.

So, sitting in your tent, you'll be producing 1.5 oz (44 mL) of CO2 per hr, while your stove will be pumping out 25 oz (740 mL) per hr, 16 times as much.

In the course of an hour, that CO2 would occupy about a half cubic meter, which in a tent can easily raise the CO2 concentration well above toxic levels.

  • This answer is one of the best answers I have read on SE anywhere. Jan 31, 2017 at 14:26
  • An hour is very long to be cooking, and this answer assumes no ventilation at all. I might cook in my tent, but only if it's windy and not before I have removed the inner tent completely, and fully opened the door and ventilation openings.
    – gerrit
    Oct 10, 2017 at 15:24

CO and CO2 dangers are real, and most tents aren't ventillated well enough without outside wind to make it safe.

CO2 dissolves well in water, especially cold water, and your body has mechanisms to deal with it. Somewhat surprisingly, what causes you to breathe harder is not lower oxygen concentrations in the blood, but higher CO2. It's just one of those quirks left over from the long, convoluted history of mechanisms that seemed to work found by accident and refined by selection that we call "evolution".

CO is the more serious danger because your body doesn't sense it and it silently displaces oxygen in the blood, eventually starving the brain of real oxygen so that you get light headed, make stupid choices, and eventually pass out.

Ideal combustion of hydrocarbons produces only CO2 and water, but no such combustion is ideal, especially in something like a camp stove that was optimized for other qualities like small size and light weight.

How much is too much? I don't know, but I'm not going to run a stove in a tent or a fuel-based lantern. Fortunately, there are now much better ways to make light than to burn fuel. I don't think a single candle is much of a issue in a normal size tent that has ventillation holes open. The amount of CO that a candle can produce is limited by the C in the tiny amount of wax it uses. Some fraction of that wax is H, not C, and most of the C will be burned to CO2, not CO. The resulting amount of CO from a single candle is therefore small, but I wouldn't ever burn more than that in a tent. Actually I wouldn't burn a candle either, since again, there are now far better ways to make light, not to mention the inherent danger of the open flame. I don't bring candles with me in the first place.

  • You are talking of making light, but what's (arguably) more common is cooking inside the tent because of bad weather, which you can't replace by candles or diode headlamps.
    – Steed
    Dec 6, 2012 at 6:14
  • @Steed: Like I said, I'm not going to run a stove or a fuel-based lantern in a tent. That a just plain bad idea. Cooking doubly so due to the residual food smell attracting bears. I went into more detail about lighting because this could be acceptable in some cases, like a single candle carefully held. Dec 6, 2012 at 15:13
  • @Steed - I can attest to having boiled a cup of water over a candle. It's slow - but it gets there ;)
    – Lost
    Dec 6, 2012 at 15:44
  • @OlinLathrop, still sometimes cooking inside is the only alternative to no cooking at all. And, imo, candle is worse that LED headlamp for lighting and worse than gas stove for cooking (because its power and energy conversion efficiency is lower and CO emission per calorie is higher).
    – Steed
    Dec 7, 2012 at 10:39

In addition to Olin Lathrop's great answer.

  • What is the relative CO and CO2 output of various products?

CO output depends on specific conditions:

  1. The type/model of the stove
  2. The quality of the fuel
  3. The supply of oxygen in the air to support combustion (it should be a problem in a crowded tent)
  4. If your stove is wet or not (moisture reduces fire temperature and combustion effeciency)

Definitely, CO output may be too high inside a tent and there is no stove which is CO-free.

  • How much air circulation does one need to keep it "ventilated" enough?

To answer this question one could analyse the death/poisoning reports to determine, how much ventilation is NOT enough.

Speaking theoretically, high CO concentration (>0.5%) is dangerous if you breathe it a couple of minutes, so if your ventilation is good enough to substitute all the air in the tent with a fresh one each 5 minutes, maybe you are ok. But please don't count on this rough estimations.

Accodring to the reports, people often don't realize thay are getting poisoned, so don't be overconfident. Probably, the best way aside from not cooking inside the tent (well, sometimes CO risk is less than the risk to get frozen) is to have someone else in another non-cooking tent, who will check you every now and again.

As for practice, we strictly avoid cooking inside a closed inner tent of a two-layer tent and try to keep an outer tent as open as possible.

Please note, that CO poisoning is not the only poisoning risk of cooking inside: there is also a risk of breathing propane/butane escaped from a loose stove-to-canister joint or even faulty canister in your backpack. So never store fuel inside a (inner) tent.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.