In answering this question I tossed out that a candle lantern can provide as much as 10 degrees (F) of temperature difference while winter camping. I've heard this tossed about before, but is it true? I assume there are differences between snow-caves (well insulated) and tents (less so)... Anyone have any cold hard numbers?

  • 2
    And you know, we could ask MythBusters to test this, but I wouldn't want to lose my tent in the explosion. :) It would be a simple experiment, though, so I'm inclined to make it a weekend project, or maybe over Christmas break. Commented Dec 18, 2012 at 2:00
  • 1
    @DonBranson That would be awesome. I love charts, graphs, and repeatable scientific results ;) - Oh, and welcome to Outdoors.SE.
    – Lost
    Commented Dec 18, 2012 at 2:09
  • In short: it may provide a little heat, but you do not want to depend on it for survival. Commented Dec 21, 2012 at 0:32
  • I think that might be in relation to snow holes. Where candles are often used to heat the interior. Snow holes are much, much better insulated than a tent.
    – user2766
    Commented Oct 10, 2016 at 13:19
  • It is very important never to raise the temperature of an igloo to the point where ice would form on the inner wall of an igloo and thus rendering the insulation properties of the snow useless. Maintaining a livable temperature in an igloo is an art.
    – Ken Graham
    Commented Oct 10, 2016 at 16:00

3 Answers 3


I've gone winter camping several times, usually staying in a tent, and I prefer to avoid candles in a tent so have no data about that.

However, on one long-weekend trip I stayed in an igloo built from blocks of snow, north of Grand Rapids MN. After the four of us on the trip skied far enough into Suomi Hills (see map) to be well away from roads and trails, we tramped down an area of snow on a lake, then after a few hours cut out snow blocks and built an igloo, about 10 feet (3 metre) across outside and a bit less than six feet (1.8 m) high inside. After it was done, I left a small candle-lantern burning inside while we fixed dinner outside.

By itself the candle warmed up the air in the igloo to 40°F (4°C), which I would count as about 8°F (5°C) of warming, supposing the inside surface of the igloo to be about 32°F (0°C). The small entrance to the igloo was covered much of the time. The air in the igloo warmed up to 50°F (10°C) with all of us in it, while outside air temp varied from 24°F (-4°C) down to -12°F (-24°C).

  • 3
    There is a BIG difference in the amount of insulation that an igloo provides when compared to a tent. A tent's insulation is minmal so most heat will be lost immediately. Where as snow is a great insulator and therefore a small amount of heat can accumulate rapidly.
    – user2766
    Commented Oct 10, 2016 at 13:16

Getting 10°F (6°C) temperature rise from a candle in even the smallest of tents is clearly nonsense. Do the math.

Figure a candle puts out about 80 W. Of course there is large variation from candle to candle, but this is in the reasonable range for a typical modern paraffin candle. Let's say 100 W to be generous.

Next we need to come up with the surface area over which this supposed 10°F (6°C) difference will dissipate across. About the smallest you could call a "tent" would need to be long enough for a person to lie down in with some extra room sideways and at the head and toes. Let's say the footprint is 8x3 feet (2.4×0.9 m²). That's "small" by most standards. Let's also say the bottom is insulated. That means the 100 W is dissipated over at least 24 square feet (2.2 m²) just due to the footprint alone. Obviously the height of the tent will add some to that. Again, let's be generous and say the surface area of concern is only 25 square feet (2.3 m²). That's very small.

Dissipating 100 W over 25 square feet (2.3 m²) means 4 watts per square foot (44 W/m²), or 13.7 BTU/h per square foot. At a insulation "R value" of 1 ft²·°F·h/BTU (0.176 m²·K/W), 13.7 BTU/h per square foot (44 W/m²) would cause a 13.7°F (7.6°C) rise. That means the tent fabric would need to have a R value of 0.73 ft²·°F·h/BTU (0.128 m²·K/W; to sustain the 10°F/6°C rise at that same power level. Not gonna happen. To put this in perspective, a 1/2 inch (1.3 cm) of plywood has a R value of 0.63 ft²·°F·h/BTU (0.111 m²·K/W), and 1/2 (1.3 cm) drywall of 0.45 ft²·°F·h/BTU (0.079 m²·K/W). Do you really think a few mils (~50 µm) of nylon are going to insulate better than a 1/2 inch (1.3 cm) of plywood?

And this is just looking at the conductive heat losses thru the tent wall fabric. Of course there will be some ventilation, so a considerable fraction of the heat power will be lost by convection. And, these were all quite conservative numbers, especially considering we'd be talking about a 4-season tent when this would matter, and those tend to be physically larger. Even taking the conservative 3x8 foot (0.9×2.4 m²) footprint and adding a side wall just 3 feet (0.9 m) tall all around adds 66 square feet (6.2 m²). 90 square feet (8.4 m²) of surface area would still be a small tent. Consider that is equivalent to a 9.5 x 9.5 foot (2.9 metre) sheet of fabric.

The point of the ultra-conservative numbers was to show that it's not even close with that, so the 10°F (6°C) rise from a candle in any real winter tent is totally absurd.

  • To add, that if the 10°/candle was true, it wouldn't take many candles to heat a tent up to nearly room temperature, but it shouldn't be too hard to realize that won't happen. Commented Dec 19, 2012 at 5:20
  • 2
    Ahh, but Snow is indeed a much better insulator as the OP wondered in the question. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R-value_(insulation) notes that it is R-1 which would make the numbers quite a bit different.
    – sdg
    Commented Jan 6, 2013 at 2:06
  • @sgd: Saying snow has any particular R value makes no sense. Perhaps some particular type of snow at a particular depth may have a reasonably repeatable R value, but just "snow" doesn't. In any case, for this snow to matter in the analisys above, it would have to cover the tent. A tent covered in snow would be better insulated than one that is not, but only for temperatures below freezing. Snow is essentially a infinite heat sink at its melting point. Commented Jan 6, 2013 at 20:02
  • 1
    @OlinLathrop I was picking up on the original question, asking about show caves. Indeed they can be warmed quite a bit from a single candle or even just radiated body heat.
    – sdg
    Commented Jan 6, 2013 at 21:34
  • 1
    @whatsisname It would take a decent number--heat loss goes up linearly with temperature. It takes 3 candles to double the gain, 6 to triple and so on. Commented Oct 27, 2018 at 12:43

A small candle burns about 1/8 ounce (3.5 g) per hour. paraffin has 19,900 btu/pound (46 MJ/kg). So a small candle releases about 19900/(8*16)=155 btu/hour (45 W).

A 5 foot (1.5 metre) diameter hemispherical igloo (including the floor) has a surface area of about 235 square feet (21.8 m²). The change in temperature was 8 degrees F (5°C). A proper igloo is about a foot (0.3 m) thick. A foot of dry snow has an R value of 12 ft²·°F·h/BTU (2.1 m²·K/W). The standard heat loss calculation is: SF * dT / R = btu/hr. In this case: 235 * 8 / 12 = 156.67 btu/hour (46 W)

So a small candle can indeed maintain the temperature of this igloo at 40F (4°C) when it's 32F (0°C) outside.

Humans at rest release about 300 btu/hour (88 W) ... much of that by breathing. This could keep the igloo at 40F (4°C) when it is significantly colder outside.

A winter tent the same size insulated with Thinsulate G600 (about 28 pounds, 12.7 kg), has an R value of 5.29 ft²·°F·h/BTU (0.93 m²·K/W). To heat it by 8 °F (5°C) you would need 235*8/5.29=355 btu/hr (100 W). That's a little less than 3 candles.

A single layer nylon tent (R=.027 ft²·°F·h/BTU, 0.004752 m²·K/W) is the same size would need 69,630 btu/hr (20.4 kW). That's 450 candles.


  • You can't use the R value of snow above the freezing point. It can insulate well, but acts as a essentially infinite heat sink at 32F (0C). Raising the temperature from 20F to 28F may be possible, but 32F to 40F is a whole different issue. Commented Feb 20, 2016 at 16:24
  • If you heat the interior of an igloo above the freezing mark, you would risk melting the wall interior of your igloo, creating a thin layer of ice in the inside and thus rendering the igloo incapable of retaining any warmth at all. Just ask an Eskimo.
    – Ken Graham
    Commented Oct 10, 2016 at 15:25
  • I've added SI conversions to your units, but the units for the R-value were not stated. I assume they were in ft²·°F·h/BTU. If not, please state what units they're in, for then my conversion to SI units will be incorrect.
    – gerrit
    Commented Oct 25, 2018 at 18:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.