I have heard many people say that eating snow actually can increase dehydration since the energy required for the body to heat up and melt the snow is greater than the benefits received from the moisture in the snow.

Truth or fiction? And please back it with solid physiological evidence.

  • Good question! I also had kind of dry feeling when I tried to eat snow... :-)
    – Tomas
    Commented Jan 27, 2012 at 16:46
  • Note: Precipitation (snow/rain) may contain some pollution, but essentially it is distilled water since it evaporated first and then fell to earth, therefore it is relatively clean and safe to drink, unlike pond water.
    – user6018
    Commented May 20, 2015 at 5:40
  • 2
    it doesn't cause dehydration, but it contributes to hyponatremia, i.e. lack of electrolytes in the blood. Commented Jun 25, 2015 at 23:23
  • My understanding is that most water lost in moderately or severely dehydrated people is through water vapor breath and sweat. The amount of energy needed to vaporize water is about 4 times than melting and heating -40 snow to 37. So snow isn't much different than water. So hold off the snow until moderate dehydration? Commented Sep 2, 2019 at 22:12

8 Answers 8


The calories to melt even frozen water are pretty small, and the water gained is certainly greater than that used to aid the use of those calories.


So 1 calorie = 1 degree celcius (roughly with minor variation). Okay easy. Except it takes 80 times that to melt it initially. Screw snow, let's figure on ice cubes.

1 liter of water frozen to ice at 0 °C
1 liter water = 1 kg water, (1000g * 80) 80,000 calories to melt the ice and then 37500 for the next 37.5° (to achieve 37.5 °C, temperature of the human body)

117500 little c calories

That's 117.5 dietary calories, because a dietary calorie is actually a kilocalorie.

How much water does it take to process 117.5 dietary calories? No where near a liter or we'd all be dead the next time we ate a christmas supper.

But if you're still in doubt... well average daily intake is 2000 calories. So if we assume ice is net negative then it must take more than a liter of water per 117.5 calories... which means that the human daily intake of water would need to be 17 liters.

Based on this article, but researched and did all the math myself to fact check it.

  • 10
    This looks correct to me (except it assumes 100% digestion efficiency, and that doesn't alter the conclusion). Eating snow definitely hydrates. It also shows that eating 500ml worth of ice/snow could drop your body temperature around 1/3 of a degree (C) in the short term. This might be significant if you're where you need to eat snow -- just something to keep in mind.
    – xpda
    Commented Mar 18, 2012 at 3:04
  • 1
    @LBell -- If expending 66 calories hastened the body's use of water enough to net negative on a liter of water, then we couldn't live. It's already in the answer. Commented Jun 8, 2012 at 2:28
  • 3
    I get 117 calories required to melt 1 kg of frozen water. Of course, even at about 2x as many calories, you're still not looking at much water usage. Eating snow will cause hypothermia long before it causes dehydration.
    – nhinkle
    Commented Aug 12, 2014 at 18:08
  • 2
    Wikipedia gives 80Cal to melt 1g of ice. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enthalpy_of_fusion
    – njzk2
    Commented Jan 12, 2015 at 22:43
  • 2
    @Wills -- No one said that. The question revolves around the amount of water necessary to process a calorie of energy. So for snow to dehydrate the body it would have to use more water processing calories to melt snow than water gained from the snow. That is not the case. Commented May 26, 2015 at 19:25

All the advice I've seen emphasises melting snow before consuming to avoid lowering your core body temperature (rather than, specifically, risking dehydration). If possible, melt the snow using a stove, or alternatively, pack the snow into a waterproof container and keep it in a pocket or your sleeping bag until it melts.

News stories such as this one, suggest that eating snow aided survival, however, I would guess there is a balance to be struck between succumbing to the effects of dehydration versus hypothermia which will depend on the environmental conditions.

  • 11
    In some cases you might want to lower your core body temperature. When hiking out or building a snow cave for example. Another issue to look for is getting sores in your mouth. As always there's no single right answer - moderation and good judgement are the key.
    – sudarkoff
    Commented Jan 26, 2012 at 17:57

As with any relatively unscientific field, there is a lot of lore out there that may have originally had a good scientific foundation, but the restrictions or specific conditions have long been forgotten and the answer takes on a life of its own out of context. The myth about eating snow seems to me to be one of these things.

The main point is that it takes a lot of energy, which when coming from your body means warmth and/or calories, to melt water to drinkable form. This is true, but the details are rarely considered. Russell has already give an good answer going over the numbers to show that the energy required is relatively minimal.

However, another point I never see addressed is that the energy is often free. If you're hiking up hill, even in winter usually, your body has to dump energy as heat. If you're cold and facing hypothermia, eating snow is probably not a good idea. Otherwise though if you're capable of dressing yourself so as to be too warm for whatever activity you are doing, you have excess heat that has to be gotten rid of somehow. Therefore except in unusual cases, melting snow with your body warmth is free since you just end up cooling yourself off less in other ways.

I have experienced this personally. Many years ago I was hiking up Mt Lassen in northern California in the summer. I had taken insufficient water with me and was getting thirsty. The weather was nice and I was hiking comfortably in shorts and a T shirt with a windbreaker in reserve in my pack. When I got high enough so there were patches of snow, I kept some in my mouth and got water from that. It definitely felt nice and made me less thirsty eventually.

The biggest problem you realize if you ever tried eating snow is that it takes a lot to get a reasonable amount of water. You simply can't put that much snow in your mouth at one time, and there is a lot of air in it, so the amount of water you get from a mouthful of snow is very limited. Still, it's better than nothing and makes you feel better. It does slow you down noticably since you have to pause to pick up fresh snow for another mouthful regularly. I suspect in warm conditions that you're barely replacing the water you are losing regularly anyway, but that's still better than losing it without replacing it.

So to me it seems that if you're thirsty and there is clean enough snow around, go ahead and "eat" it unless you are cold and hypothermia is a concern. Dehydration, after all, is a serious problem too.

  • 1
    I'd not call the amount of energy minimal (considering that consuming 2 kg of snow to replace 2 l of water would correspond to about 1/7 metabolic base rate) but as you say: iff you actually have excess heat, it's going to help doubly: you get the water and don't need to sweat. Commented Apr 19, 2018 at 20:02

If you can, melt it beforehand - not because of dehydration but because of the obvious; it'll cause you to get rather cold rather quickly!

If you can't and it really is an emergency (the only time I'd suggest it might be worth considering) then I haven't found a general consensus on whether it's a good idea, probably because it comes very much down to judging the situation - hydration vs. core body temperature. Do bear in mind that you won't get anywhere near the amount of fresh water from snow though so it may not hydrate you as effectively as you might be imagining.

One final point, never drink / eat coloured snow. I don't just mean the obvious cause of coloured snow - it can have all sorts of colours to it, and aside from the obvious this is most commonly caused by bacteria which are often rather nasty if ingested. This will almost always make the situation worse, not better!

  • So, would it be reasonable to think of eating snow off the ground as drinking untreated water from a puddle? In terms of risk of bacteria/other pathogens? (I know not as much will live in snow, I'm wondering what snow-borne pathogens can or will do to you if you ingest them). Commented Feb 9, 2012 at 12:09
  • 1
    @ClareSteen I've never been unlucky enough to be in that situation (fortunately!) The advantage with snow is that usually the bad bacteria turn it a different colour so you can tell not to eat it pretty easily. From what I've heard, it can essentially be like a very nasty stomach bug if you eat it. Definitely not what you want if you're out in the wilderness!
    – berry120
    Commented Feb 9, 2012 at 12:12
  • I filter or boil it before I drink water from melted snow.
    – xpda
    Commented Mar 17, 2012 at 15:35
  • Actually the most common cause of colored snow is algae, not bacteria. However, your point remains. Ingesting the algae can be bad. Commented Nov 14, 2012 at 0:32

Yes, but it will really make you cold. It takes about 30 times more heat to heat water (melt ice) from 31 to 33 degrees (F) than it does to heat it from 33 to 35 degrees. That heat comes from your body if you eat snow.


There are reported deaths from eating snow during WWII (Eastern Front). I presume due to hypothermia and/or the general poor health of the soldiers concerned.

Another site points out that snow is excellent at catching polution. Their reasoning is a bit fuzzy, but as a scientist I agree with their conclusion.

  • There is good information in this answer, but I would change it a bit to more directly answer the question. If you don't want to I would be happy to show you what I mean. Good start, and welcome to The Great Outdoors S.E. Commented Oct 8, 2012 at 16:23
  • 2
    Yeah, without being able to look at the original report, I am skeptical that they actually died of eating snow. What other factors were envolved? How do we know that eating snow was a contibuting factor, let alone the main cause? What was the actual cause of death? Was there a control in the same conditions where some ate snow and some didn't? Were these people already hypothermic? Would they likely have died anyway from other causes, like freezing to death? Commented Nov 14, 2012 at 0:30
  • @OlinLathrop: at the very least they were quite unlikely to be well fed, which basically means not far from hypothermia. And then the energy needed to melt and heat the snow may make a whole lot of a difference... Commented Apr 19, 2018 at 20:05

One point I would like to add to all the good answer before:

Snow is good at catching pollution. But it isn´t good in containg minerals. Apart from short-term hydration, you should NOT rely on snow as water source for a longer period of time because you simply won´t get the electrolytes you need - at least if you don´t supply them for example through food. This is also true for rain water and to some extent for ice.

Also I would like to point out, that Russels calculation may be right, but it doesn´t take into account where the heat is consumed. So it can be true that it doesn´t need to much heat, it can also be true that it lowers your core body temperature. I would try to melt it outside my body (e. g. in a bottle close to my body) or in the mouth, if necessary.


The most authoritative source I know is the Wilderness Medicine textbook, and it has some very useful information on this problem.

Snow is mostly air.

Let's say you stuff yourself full of snow. Unfortunately, the snow you eat is mostly air and not water. So it is extremely hard to get fully hydrated because though you get full, when the snow melts into water you only get a fourth or a fifth of the volume of the snow in water.

The solution to this is sometimes quite easy. Dig. If you have no choice but to eat unmelted snow for water, dig down. The deeper you dig in the snow, the more dense the snow is. And when denser snow melts it yields more water.

Melt the snow first.

Obviously, the ideal solution is to melt the snow first, so you can drink liquid water. The trick here is melting the snow. Wilderness Medicine includes a lot of case reports and has one definite conclusion: PLEASE do not use your body heat to melt the snow. You will increase your risk of hypothermia in a survival situation. Any other method to melt the snow would be extremely helpful to your survival.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.