I was going through anchoring techniques and I came across this well-received question:
Anchor without cordelette?

How should one decide when to go for a Cordelette or an Equalette?


2 Answers 2


I've had to deal with this question a lot teaching anchor building. When people have asked in the past I normally suggest they use the anchor you are most comfortable setting up, as they will both definitely work.

That said, if we want to dive deeper into the rabbit hole, it's important to identify some distinct differences between them.

Equalette: Typical top-rope setup on bolts or gear using a sewn-sling or cord. Characterized by carabiners on separate strands, most often with limiting knots to each side.

Equalette Anchor

Advantages over Cordelette:

  • Anchor is self-equalizing (meaning if you pull the load 20 degrees to the left, it's still going to distribute the weight between the two points).
  • Faster if pre-setup and tossed around your shoulder (when you get to the bolts at the end of a climb, attach one slide to each bolt and you're done).
  • Stronger than cordelette if tied using a sewn-sling.

Cordelette: Mostly now seen where an Equalette isn't. Characterized by a huge knot joining all connection points together.

Cordelette Anchor

Advantages over Equalette:

  • Just as easy to setup with 3, 4 or even 5 pieces of gear as it is with 2 (making it more versatile for trad anchors or suspect ice anchors).
  • Cheaper than sewn-slings if you need to leave it behind.
  • Faster to set up from scratch, and much much faster to re-rack when you're ready to take it down (often only one knot needs to be removed, and it's usually much bulkier and easier to untie).

While discussions about anchors, (especially theoretical holding power), may rage on for generations to come, you can probably make some good rules of thumb by thinking about the most significant differences.

For single-pitch climbing: use an Equalette setup whenever the route traverses significantly, and use a Cordellete when the route follows a direct line up.

Additional reading: Lots of anchors variations exist - the Triplet, ACR, and Sliding X to name a few. They are all useful to know also. In a multi-pitch context, having a master point involving two carabiners is a major pain so the Equalette would be off the table for me. The more anchors you can tie, the more you can plug in what makes the most sense.

Update: See what is an equalette anchor for additional pictures and discussion.

  • 3
    Err, the first is a sliding X with limiter knots, not really an equalette. The hallmark of the equalette is a loop clipped to the closest piece, and the remaining pieces are clove-hitched in order to adjust the length just how you want it.
    – requiem
    Oct 1, 2014 at 0:07
  • 3
    Fixed image to better speak to the typical equalette setup. It's worth noting that even equalette's anchors themselves can come in different forms. See text/images from John Long's book on climbing. inkling.com/read/how-rock-climb-john-long/chapter-5/section-5-9
    – Raz Peel
    Oct 1, 2014 at 5:14
  • Your description of the equalette still sounds more like a sliding-x than an equalette.
    – ShemSeger
    Aug 5, 2015 at 16:49
  • the confusion is likely due to how similar in form they both are. Paraphrasing Cyril Shokople and John Long's explanations: "In its simplest form two carabiners are placed into the master point of the sliding X configuration (one on each strand instead of using an X)". The equalette simply distributes the load more evenly because it eliminates friction.
    – Raz Peel
    Aug 5, 2015 at 23:08
  • 1
    If interested, I found some great summarized information about anchor's including a little bit of history from Cyril's website at: rescuedynamics.ca/articles/pdfs/EarnestAnchors3.pdf
    – Raz Peel
    Aug 5, 2015 at 23:10

Both cordelettes and equalettes are made from loops of durable material; either a very large sewn sling or a loop of accessory cord (6 meters of 7 mm accessory cord is a common length).

The issue with cordelettes that led to the idea of the equalette is that a standard cordelette does not equalize loads all that well. Most of the load will be applied to the shortest arm, and a chance in the direction of pull results in significantly different forces being applied to each arm. Good equalization with a cordelette is only achieved when each arm is the same length and the direction of pull remains constant.

So, if all your anchor pieces are roughly level with each other, and the direction of pull will remain straight up and down, your cordelette should still work OK. The equalette tries to address the problem of off-axis loading (i.e. the direction of pull not remaining constant) and unequal length arms. Note that both the equalette and the cordelette may be made with any number of arms; it's common to use 3-4 pieces of gear when a pair of solid bolts is not available.

In testing, a cordelette with unequal arms resulted in the largest difference in forces between each arm (around 3-4 kN difference). A cordelette with equal arms and a sliding-X with unequal arms performed similarly to each other, with a much better difference in force between arms, about 1 kN. Finally, an equalette with unequal length arms performed similarly to a sliding-X with equal arms, and both of those saw the lowest difference in forces, around 0.5 kN.

Reference: Climbing Anchors (How To Climb Series)

  • Good answer, though I personally liked the one by Raz Peel. +1 for Good equalization with a cordelette is only achieved when each arm is the same length and the direction of pull remains constant
    – WedaPashi
    Oct 1, 2014 at 6:11
  • 1
    Thanks! He has the more thorough one (with pics!), I just wanted to add in some extra bits.
    – requiem
    Oct 1, 2014 at 6:21

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.