15

Fishing is 95% waiting and 5% action, well at least that's how it is for me. During the down time, I contemplate deeply on some obscure and inane things. For a while I've wondered if an angler is holding his or her rod when the line is in still water, would it be possible for a fish to actually sense any vibrations of that angler's heartbeat through the water? I know that fish in general are able to sense currents, and vibrations but to what extent? I started alternating fishing without holding my rod (using a bell to indicate a bite or nibble of course), and holding my rod for the whole day and my results were inconclusive. Thanks for not laughing:P

  • 8
    If you write this up properly, you may get a grant! – ab2 ReinstateMonicaNow Sep 12 '15 at 23:31
  • 1
    Yep, all I need now is a degree in ichthyology and a degree in physics wouldn't hurt either. ;) – zer00ne Sep 14 '15 at 18:57
  • 2
    Many modern fishing innovations have focused on increasing sensitivity - in lines, rods, and handles. It would make sense that this increasingly sensitive connection between the bait/lure and the angler would go both ways - that they would transmit information from angler to the terminal tackle as well as it transmits information the other way. I am merely speculating here, but I would bet that some fish could feel a heartbeat under some conditions. But the fact that anglers feel that this increased sensitivity is an advantage to them makes me think that heartbeat doesn't scare the fish. – That Idiot Sep 16 '15 at 16:26
  • @ThatIdiot yeah, you and Gwenn are probably right, I still can't tell if handling the rod or leaving it alone makes any difference (I live by a river so I fish almost everyday). – zer00ne Sep 18 '15 at 5:40
  • 2
    Considering that you can take a powerboat and motor right up to where some bass or crappie are holding out, and come to a fast stop there, and start casting out and catching them right away, it's unlikely at least those two classes of fish are going to care whether or not they can sense your heartbeat. – Michael Martinez Sep 21 '15 at 21:55
14

The answer is no under most conditions. And even if they could, it is unlikely that it would scare the fish.

First the physics. No matter how sensitive fish are to vibrations in the water, a fish investigating your line would have to sort the vibrations from your heartbeat from all the other vibrations in your line that come from other sources, including the line vibrating in response to the wind, the water, and your own movement. It's a matter of signal-to-noise ratio, and when you are fishing, the ambient noise in the environment outweighs the vibrations from your own heartbeat by several orders of magnitude.

Now the psychology. Even if the fish could pick out the rhythmic pulse of your heartbeat in the movement of your line, why would the fish know to be afraid of it? Vibrations occur naturally all of the time in nature, especially in water, most of the time for completely benign reasons, so it doesn't make evolutionary sense for fish to be afraid of all vibrations. The human heartbeat is relatively slow compared to other predators of fish, so in order for fish to be afraid of the human heartbeat, they would need to have evolved this fear directly because of human fishermen. The problem with this idea, though, is that human fishermen give off way more obvious clues to their presence that fish don't pick up on.

So no, you are not scaring away any fish with your own heartbeat.

  • human fishermen give off way more obvious clues to their presence that fish don't pick up on. So what else are fish oblivious to? I'd like to know if there's other things that I don't have to worry about. – zer00ne Sep 18 '15 at 5:34
  • @zer00ne see my comment to your question – Michael Martinez Sep 21 '15 at 21:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.