Many bicycle panniers are made of waterproof material. Backpacks are not, necessitating built-in or separate raincovers. Why don't backpacks use the material that waterproof panniers do? Unlike gear to be worn on the body, there's no need for backpacks to breathe.

  • 5
    If you think that "waterproof material" exists in the first place, you have clearly never gone camping in Western Washington. ;) Commented Oct 26, 2015 at 15:07
  • @MasonWheeler I've camped in Norway enough and I don't think that's much drier. Waterproof material exists, otherwise, all bottled would leak.
    – gerrit
    Commented Oct 26, 2015 at 15:42
  • 1
    I suppose bottles would count. But when people say "waterproof", they're generally talking about things made of fabric, such as tents or backpacks. In that context, I have yet to see any convincing evidence for its existence. Commented Oct 26, 2015 at 17:53
  • 3
    @MasonWheeler Dry bags are designed to keep their contents dry even when submerged in water (up to a certain pressure). Some backback dry bags apparently do exist, I haven't tried any. I've never had the contents of my dry bag become wet, even when everything else was soaked. So I don't agree with your suggestion that waterproof material does not exist.
    – gerrit
    Commented Oct 26, 2015 at 18:12
  • All I know is, rule #1 of going camping in Western Washington is that you will get rained on, no matter what the weather forecast said, and rule #2 is that waterproof tents... aren't. And rule #2 is what makes rule #1 so problematic. Commented Oct 26, 2015 at 18:17

7 Answers 7


There are quite a few backpacks made of waterproof materials, especially among cottage manufacturers. ZPacks, Hyperlight Mountain Gear, Zimmerbuilt, Gossamer Gear, and many others manufacture packs out of Hybrid Cuben Fiber, Dimension Polyant X-Pac fabrics, or other waterproof materials. Even more mainstream manufacturers use a good deal of waterproof fabrics. Speaking anecdotally, my REI Flash 45 uses waterproof fabric for most of the pack body.

However, there is more to waterproofing a pack than the fabrics. Even packs that use waterproof textiles are not sufficiently waterproof unless the seams are sealed. Moreover, water can enter through zippers or drawcord openings. There are some packs on the market designed not to need a liner or cover (the ZPacks Arc Blast, for example), but achieving this requires a number of design considerations. They must simplify construction to minimize the number and complexity of seams to seal, they must eliminate features that create entry points for water (like hydration hose ports and zippers), and they must use a rolltop closure to seal out water.

On a simple ultralight pack, this isn't much of a compromise. But as complexity increases, rainproofing becomes more and more difficult to achieve, to the point where it is simply easier (and lighter) to add a pack liner or cover.


The complexity of backpacks, as well as the typical use case scenario has a lot to do with why the backpacks themselves aren't waterproofed.

For example, the typical day in the life of a bicycle pannier involves relatively little exposure to water. You take it out in the rain for an hour or two, and then usually you take it inside with you wherever you go. This makes waterproofing the pannier itself logical, because the waterproof layer can sustain those two hours. But waterproof layers typically have an unspoken time limit. If you've ever exposed a 'waterproof' pannier or 'waterproof' boots to water for more than a few hours, you start to realize the limits of waterproof layers. They're usually, not truly waterproof.

Add to this the fact that waterproof fabrics are typically heavy and they don't breathe very well, and you've got a recipe for inefficiency. If you've ever worn a waterproof backpack, you know how heavy they can be and how poorly they breathe.

All this to say, it's more efficient, lighter, and cheaper to place individual items in dry sacks. The lightweight dry sacks. They keep your stuff organized, and they keep things dry no matter how soaked your backpack is.


Backpacks are primarily designed to be carried out therefore they need to be light. They also need to be tough so they can endure the trips the specified weights for a long time.

Although we do get rained out every now and again no one plans a trip around raining days (Oh look, it's raining let's go hiking). So it's more "efficient" to keep the packs light using a lighter material and just put a simple rain cover in case of rain than make the packs heavier with waterproof material.

There are waterproof packs in the market. I own a couple myself.

My petzl portage 30 looks more like a drybag with shoulder straps but I use that one specific for canyoning. I also have a my hiking/trekking pack that uses c-canvas that is waterproof but then my pack weights 3kgs alone. Cactus Foray

My wife has an Osprey Ariel 50 and it's a whole kg lighter than mine. Even if we compare a pack the same size as mine (70L), the Osprey one still a good 800gr lighter and that includes the cover that comes with the pack.

So, in summary...

  • yes, there are packs in the market with waterproof specs.
  • they varies depending what you are planning to do.
  • Having waterproof packs might not be the best approach in some cases. (My wife would hate to carry my pack even to go down to the fish and chips shop.)

I've been backpacking for over 40 years now. Nearly all backpacks start with waterproof fabric. The problem with "waterproof" backpacks is primarily the seams, then secondarily the strain put on the various fabrics. The seams are made up of a series of holes poked through the waterproof fabric with thread poked through them. It invariably makes a waterproof fabric not waterproof any longer. Seam sealing to re-seal the holes helps, but it isn't always perfect.

Now consider that every time you load, open, unload your pack, you are wearing the waterproof coating down. Eventually it will wear through and leak. Another problem is that water is pretty invasive. it drips and finds its way into the pack itself. If it's windy, the rain seems to defy gravity.

The best solution is to determine which pieces of your gear absolutely have to be dry, then put them in waterproof bags inside the pack. Don't count on the backpack even with a pack cover, to keep everything dry. Bag your sleeping bag and clothes. The rest can usually survive water...


Like a lot of decision made by a manufacturer it's a case of profit! At some level they've made a commercial decision. Waterproof fabrics are expensive, so if you make a bag using them then you have pass this onto the customer or take a hit on your profits. I would imagine that they've researched this and decided the demand for this doesn't match the outlay they'd need to invest in such a product.

  • 2
    It seems far fetched that the expense would be an issue. Reputable brands almost always have low and high tier products. Sure, the less expensive tiers are going to appeal to the average consumer and turn inventory faster, but there will always be a healthy supply of professionals that need the best gear money can buy. Commented Oct 26, 2015 at 18:04
  • Money, duh, +1. I've owned the same Alice pack for 25y and it once spent an entire Chicago winter sitting on a picnic bench. The USM doesn't mess around. The straps alone were $40, and that was two and a half decades ago. Made from 600d polyester, it is however best described as water resistant.
    – Mazura
    Commented Sep 16, 2021 at 7:05

Another factor: Anything flexible and waterproof will in time wear and not be quite so waterproof. Even more so when it's exposed to the occasional jab from a tree or the like.

Thus there is an advantage to having your waterproof layer be reasonably cheap to replace when it ceases to be as waterproof as you want. Also, I don't use up the durability of the rain cover when it's not raining--as someone living in a desert that is a substantial factor.


Waterproofing works in two directions. It keeps water out, but if water does get in it can also turn the inside of your pack into a swimming pool. Packs frequently get opened and closed multiple times a day and the opening is usually at the top. If just one of those times you didn't properly seal things up, a water proof pack could fill with water submerging the things inside for hours. Even water proof sacks you may be keeping your important items like a sleeping bag in aren't always water proof against extended submersion. Better to have your pack be water resistant so it will drain than potentially turn your pack into a pool.

  • That doesn't really address why bicycle panniers (at least those for touring) usually are waterproof.
    – gerrit
    Commented Sep 20, 2021 at 9:50
  • @gerrit "Packs frequently get open and closed multiple times a day". In my experience that is not as true for panniers. Bike packing tends to have multiple smaller storage locations so frequently used items are not stored with the rest of your stuff, so your "main pack" only gets packed up once a day.
    – Barker
    Commented Sep 20, 2021 at 16:57

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.