Skip to main content
The Great Outdoors

Return to Answer

added 50 characters in body
Source Link
Jeff Crossett
Jeff Crossett
  • 19
  • 3

You would not have been noticeably warmer (assuming temperature was the only challenge).

The problem is the (apparent) lack of insulation under you. Whatever insulation your bag has is (for the most part) negated when being compressed by your body weight. You were cold because you were only insulating half of your body.

You would not have been noticeably warmer.

The problem is the (apparent) lack of insulation under you. Whatever insulation your bag has is (for the most part) negated when being compressed by your body weight. You were cold because you were only insulating half of your body.

You would not have been noticeably warmer (assuming temperature was the only challenge).

The problem is the (apparent) lack of insulation under you. Whatever insulation your bag has is (for the most part) negated when being compressed by your body weight. You were cold because you were only insulating half of your body.

Source Link
Jeff Crossett
Jeff Crossett
  • 19
  • 3

You would not have been noticeably warmer.

The problem is the (apparent) lack of insulation under you. Whatever insulation your bag has is (for the most part) negated when being compressed by your body weight. You were cold because you were only insulating half of your body.