Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 19, 2022 at 15:47 comment added gerrit @DJClayworth It's been a while since I was there, so I'm not sure. I think sometimes the sites were probably less than 100 meter from water as the crow flies, but further than that as a human would walk (for other animals it probably depends on the species). Lesser visited parts of Jasper do allow dispersed camping (not widely advertised). And several mornings I woke up in the middle of a water source, which was usually white and frozen ;-)
Jan 19, 2022 at 15:22 comment added DJClayworth Jasper has fixed campsites, and they mostly look to be on rivers (from the Backcountry Guide). Are they actually 100m away, and the scale is deceiving me?
Jan 19, 2022 at 15:03 comment added gerrit @DJClayworth I didn't find it hard to camp 100m from water sources in Jasper National Park, but the Algonquin would be a different story, certainly if swamps are included.
Jan 19, 2022 at 14:55 comment added DJClayworth Must be a US thing. Here in Canada everybody camps by the lake. Often it would be hard to find a place that was 100m from all water sources.
Oct 16, 2015 at 14:52 vote accept gerrit
Apr 30, 2014 at 8:14 history edited user2766
edited tags
May 3, 2013 at 7:56 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackOutdoors/status/330229436333047808
May 2, 2013 at 21:29 answer added That Bryan Davies timeline score: 15
Apr 23, 2013 at 4:54 comment added whatsisname Everyone likes camping right by the shore. Invariably, everyone would camp in nearly the same spot, and ultimately trash the place. Dispersing campsites prevents that, to some degree.
Apr 22, 2013 at 9:08 history edited Lost CC BY-SA 3.0
Changed title to make more clear (I think - change back if you wish, I wont be offended)
Apr 22, 2013 at 7:02 answer added Lost timeline score: 28
Apr 21, 2013 at 23:33 history edited ppl
edited tags
Apr 21, 2013 at 23:09 answer added user2169 timeline score: 10
Apr 21, 2013 at 21:51 history asked gerrit CC BY-SA 3.0