Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 8, 2013 at 3:00 review Community Evaluations
Aug 15, 2013 at 3:00
Jun 17, 2013 at 0:34 answer added Nate Eldredge timeline score: 1
Jun 15, 2013 at 1:37 vote accept DudeOnRock
Jun 15, 2013 at 1:33 comment added DudeOnRock @OlinLathrop: Using a topo is fine when trying to figure out the names of a hand-full of nearby peaks, but is not a very efficient method for identifying bumps at the horizon (I would have to cary maps for areas I am not hiking in,) or for tagging the names of peaks visible in pictures taken from the top.
Jun 14, 2013 at 6:00 comment added Steed @DavidR, printed (and possibly laminated) material answers your question. Of course, this should be prepared in advance (but planning your backcountry trip in advance is always a good idea).
Jun 13, 2013 at 14:09 comment added DavidR question - if there was a product like Google Image Search that could identify peaks, is it something you could rely on when you're in the backcountry, without a reliable wireless data connection, or the ability to recharge a device?
Jun 13, 2013 at 13:39 answer added Kai K. timeline score: 2
Jun 13, 2013 at 9:09 answer added Steed timeline score: 4
Jun 12, 2013 at 23:11 comment added Olin Lathrop I don't know of any peak-finder, especially one you can take into the backcountry with you. However, I don't see why using a topo map needs to be "painstaking". I have used them often for this purpose and never considered it particularly difficult or burdensome.
Jun 12, 2013 at 20:22 history asked DudeOnRock CC BY-SA 3.0