Skip to main content
edited tags
Link
gerrit
  • 27.5k
  • 13
  • 93
  • 207
edited tags
Link
Charlie Brumbaugh
  • 69.4k
  • 38
  • 226
  • 433
Point out I'm backpacking, don't want to carry a lot of mass.
Source Link
gerrit
  • 27.5k
  • 13
  • 93
  • 207

According to leave-no-trace principles, one should bury human waste (poo).

But burying damages plants and roots. Is this really always better than not burying it and pooing on the surface?

(Of course, the only way to truly leave no trace is to not go at all.)

Edit: This assuming a context when I am carrying everything on by back; solutions that require carrying significant additional mass are not preferred.

According to leave-no-trace principles, one should bury human waste (poo).

But burying damages plants and roots. Is this really always better than not burying it and pooing on the surface?

(Of course, the only way to truly leave no trace is to not go at all.)

According to leave-no-trace principles, one should bury human waste (poo).

But burying damages plants and roots. Is this really always better than not burying it and pooing on the surface?

(Of course, the only way to truly leave no trace is to not go at all.)

Edit: This assuming a context when I am carrying everything on by back; solutions that require carrying significant additional mass are not preferred.

Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackOutdoors/status/497188604977119232
Rephrased
Source Link
gerrit
  • 27.5k
  • 13
  • 93
  • 207
Loading
Source Link
gerrit
  • 27.5k
  • 13
  • 93
  • 207
Loading